12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellysituations. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, research <strong>in</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g, health promotion and earlyeducation add strength to the notion of new ways of work<strong>in</strong>g together withAborig<strong>in</strong>al people <strong>in</strong> strength based, collaborative, and knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>gways (see for example Puzan2003, Brough, Bond & Hunt 2004 and Power2004). Co-researchers and I also envisioned a methodology that could help uscreate new knowledge together and put it <strong>in</strong>to practice. These criteria led us toaction research.I had a strong <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ways of collaboratively. In my previousMasters research I had attempted a basic participatory action research, butwhile knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g had been shared with<strong>in</strong> each focus group of likem<strong>in</strong>ded people, I had not developed a strategy for shar<strong>in</strong>g and build<strong>in</strong>gknowledge and action between the different focus groups. In this researchproject, f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ways of shar<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and work<strong>in</strong>g together towardpragmatic and positive outcomes was crucial. The Ganma knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>gmetaphor suggested a way forward, and I was keen to f<strong>in</strong>d a methodology thatwould assist us to put this <strong>in</strong>to action. Reflect<strong>in</strong>g on the communityconsultations and Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Women’s Reference Group discussions, manyother people shared this aim.There are many forms of action research, each with its own underly<strong>in</strong>g historyand philosophy (Reason, Peter & Bradbury, Hilary 2006). What they have <strong>in</strong>common is that they have both a research and an action component. Most havean emergent methodology (‘grow<strong>in</strong>g’ the way of do<strong>in</strong>g research as the researchunfolds and deepens) that aims to achieve change (action) and understand<strong>in</strong>g(research) at the same time (Dick 2007). The research process is usuallycyclical, participative and qualitative with earlier cycles <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g later cycles.Methods, data collection, analysis, <strong>in</strong>terpretation and future action developthrough and by each cycle. Know<strong>in</strong>g and do<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed (Str<strong>in</strong>ger2007). Often multiple methods and triangulation (us<strong>in</strong>g multiple methods andtheories to draw conclusions to prevent a bias) are used to collect and analysedata, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rigour and credibility (Grbich 2004).There is a great variation <strong>in</strong> the extent of collaboration and participation with<strong>in</strong>different forms of action research. Hart and Bond (1995) describe thesedifferences by identify<strong>in</strong>g the role of researchers and participants.123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!