12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellyaspects <strong>in</strong> future collaborative programs, with the few resources available to us(th<strong>in</strong>k and discuss).The women orig<strong>in</strong>ally envisioned a well run, well resourced comprehensiveprimary health care program with transport, cater<strong>in</strong>g, childcare and craftmaterials supplied. We compiled a list of what would be needed for this tooccur. We then identified the health professional support, funds and resourcesthat were immediately available to us. Compar<strong>in</strong>g the two lists, we madepragmatic decisions together about the very basics we needed to run a group.These became; a room, a group of women, someone to help facilitate theprocess (me) and preferably a small amount of money to pay for cater<strong>in</strong>g, craftitems, and transport if needed. The women decided they could do withoutchildcare support by br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g any children <strong>in</strong>to the group and car<strong>in</strong>g for themtogether.This collaborative process enabled everyone’s knowledges to be <strong>in</strong>cluded andswirl together <strong>in</strong> Ganma knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g processes, creat<strong>in</strong>g newknowledge (foam) about how to beg<strong>in</strong> a women’s group with m<strong>in</strong>imalresources. We focused on what was available and what we could create, ratherthan on what we didn’t have. Very democratic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g processes wereembraced, with the butcher’s paper becom<strong>in</strong>g an acknowledgement anddecision mak<strong>in</strong>g tool. Our processes were similar to those described byBelenky and colleagues (1973) as Midwife and Connected teach<strong>in</strong>g. Thewomen’s own thought were supported and nurtured to maturity withunderstand<strong>in</strong>g that uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty was part of the process. I was able to hold botha subjective and objective position, encourag<strong>in</strong>g the women to trust their ownth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and embrace community as well as health system resources. Thisenabled us to address issues <strong>in</strong> new and creative ways. Even though we couldnot develop exactly the k<strong>in</strong>d of program the women orig<strong>in</strong>ally envisioned, thecollaborative process of work<strong>in</strong>g it out together meant that the result<strong>in</strong>gprogram could still meet their most press<strong>in</strong>g needs. The women felt this was animportant achievement with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the pass<strong>in</strong>g parade of health care.203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!