12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet KellyTh<strong>in</strong>k and Discuss and Take Action. Some of the co-researchers were able tobe <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g Str<strong>in</strong>ger and understand his <strong>in</strong>terpretation of PAR moreclearly. They saw possibilities for high impact with the m<strong>in</strong>imal resources andtime available. As identified by Dana Shen, Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Executive Officer ofHuman Services, any effective actions needed three aspects; the communitywould want to be <strong>in</strong>volved, staff would have the capacity and the system wouldsupport it (Shen 2006).Support<strong>in</strong>g each other through the difficult timesIt was important to address co-researchers’ immediate issues and concernsbefore try<strong>in</strong>g to focus on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g client access and health care programs.Str<strong>in</strong>ger (2007) describes a process beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with the co-researchers highestpriority, and then work<strong>in</strong>g outwards <strong>in</strong> a spiral pattern. Eventually, and moreeffectively, the process will touch on the issue that the action researcher is coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g(<strong>in</strong> this case Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women’s health and well-be<strong>in</strong>g). Byfollow<strong>in</strong>g this process, many of the personal priorities, issues or circumstancesthat can prevent collaborative action from succeed<strong>in</strong>g are attended to along theway.Co-researchers were concerned about the lack of resources, support and shortterm contracts that were lead<strong>in</strong>g to such a high turn over of staff. Withoutimprovements, it was difficult for them to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> current services much lessma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> any form of collaborative action. They felt that unrealisticexpectations were placed upon them, and when they could not meet these, theywere blamed (or blamed themselves) for their deficiencies. On one level theyknew that their organisation could not meet complex client needs, and that onany given day, their services could be, and often was, thrown <strong>in</strong>to chaos.Unfortunately such realism is not often written <strong>in</strong>to local, organisational, statewide and nationally health policies. They felt that there was an unspokenassumption that health strategies can be successfully implemented as directedfrom above, if workers only tried harder or worked better.Co-researchers spoke of feel<strong>in</strong>g excluded from decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and strategicplann<strong>in</strong>g processes. One said ‘our requests go up; they th<strong>in</strong>k about it, thedirective comes down. There is not much discussion’ (AH FG3). There was236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!