12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellyhealth care agenda. <strong>Health</strong> professionals’ recognition of the hugely complexnature of clients’ health and well be<strong>in</strong>g was overlooked, and simplisticselective health care programs and directives were expected to beimplemented. When <strong>in</strong>adequate selective primary care programs did not runsmoothly, health professionals felt blamed for health program failures byhigher level managers. Inadequate and at times unsafe communicationpathways prevented health professionals from safely feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation andcritique back up the l<strong>in</strong>e.This situation calls <strong>in</strong>to question what is accepted as evidence based practice <strong>in</strong>primary health care and research. This research identified that culturally safeand client centered care required client and health professional knowledge tobe recognised as significant evidence, alongside technical and biologicalknowledge. Unmodified and unquestioned selective primary care can notadequately address the deep rooted social, economic and historical factors thatunderlay the health disparities that many Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people cont<strong>in</strong>ue toexperience. <strong>Health</strong> professional and client knowledge needs to be recognisedand <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> bottom up policies and decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. Experientially based<strong>in</strong>tuitive understand<strong>in</strong>g should be considered as evidence, and evolv<strong>in</strong>gresearch agenda should constantly question who def<strong>in</strong>es best evidence, andwho judges it (see for example MCHenna 2000 and Rycroft-Malone, Seers,Titchen, Harvey, Kitson & McCormack 2004) For this to occur, two-wayknowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g between health professionals, managers, policy makers andscientists would need to occur. This would require changes <strong>in</strong> perceptionsabout power and knowledge and a sw<strong>in</strong>g back toward comprehensive primaryhealth care across all levels of government and the health care system.Concepts of Ganma two-way knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g and Dadirri deep listen<strong>in</strong>gwere more successful <strong>in</strong> bridg<strong>in</strong>g understand<strong>in</strong>gs between different sectors andagencies, such as the health service, the youth sector and local high school. Ashared understand<strong>in</strong>g of the holistic and comprehensive health needs of youngAborig<strong>in</strong>al women and the impacts of lower social determ<strong>in</strong>ants of healthemerged. From this specific strategies and programs were successfullydeveloped.333

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!