12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellycommunity members, health managers and staff members <strong>in</strong> respectfulknowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g.In 2002 the Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Mothers Group ended due to health service policy andfund<strong>in</strong>g changes and as a result, partnerships between the community womenand health professionals decreased. In 2003/4 the four women became<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the Family Well Be<strong>in</strong>g Course with an external facilitator, wherethey aga<strong>in</strong> experienced be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cluded and work<strong>in</strong>g collaboratively. They wereencouraged to complete tra<strong>in</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong>er component and help co-facilitatefuture courses, a move that raised expectations of future collaboration.However, the course f<strong>in</strong>ished, the facilitator moved on, and the Aborig<strong>in</strong>alNeighbourhood House was still not open. The women fell <strong>in</strong>to a gap <strong>in</strong> serviceprovision. Becom<strong>in</strong>g frustrated, two of the women became <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>community activism and writ<strong>in</strong>g a letter of compla<strong>in</strong>t, a move that led them tobe<strong>in</strong>g firmly placed <strong>in</strong> the position of be<strong>in</strong>g disruptive and ‘the Other’ byAborig<strong>in</strong>al heath services and managers. In research <strong>in</strong>terviews I was warnedby three Aborig<strong>in</strong>al managers about work<strong>in</strong>g with those women, who had ahistory of be<strong>in</strong>g disruptive and not follow<strong>in</strong>g the proper channels of directnegotiation (Mg I1, 2, 3). This negative attitude toward the women filtereddown to health professionals <strong>in</strong> the newly develop<strong>in</strong>g health service, and wasfurther <strong>in</strong>flamed by the angry responses of the community women themselves.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviews and discussions with health professionals at the Aborig<strong>in</strong>alOutreach <strong>Health</strong> Service, the four Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women from Collaboration AreaOne were repeatedly referred to as ‘those women’. Us<strong>in</strong>g PAR strategies, Isought to unpack this situation by ask<strong>in</strong>g what exactly those women did thatwas so problematic, and whether it happened all of the time, or only <strong>in</strong> specificcircumstances. Some health professionals identified that those womenmonopolised services, and were non-compliant and aggressive. Furtherdiscussion and analysis enabled a deeper exploration of the situation. I hadidentified from the themes emerg<strong>in</strong>g from Collaboration Area One that theAborig<strong>in</strong>al community women were seek<strong>in</strong>g ongo<strong>in</strong>g support and connectionwith health professionals. The women attended the cl<strong>in</strong>ics regularly becausethey were the only programs available. In the comprehensive primary healthcare programs they had previously attended, regular contact was expected and255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!