12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet KellyRights and Equal Opportunities Commission (HROEC) 2005). The <strong>in</strong>quiry <strong>in</strong>toAborig<strong>in</strong>al Deaths <strong>in</strong> Custody (Human Rights and Equal OpportunitiesCommission - HROEC 1991) found that 80% of those who had suicided had been<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions at some time dur<strong>in</strong>g their childhood, re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g the detrimentalimpact this policy had on Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Australians.Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of abuse, sexual assault and long term health and well-be<strong>in</strong>geffects have emerged <strong>in</strong> Canada from research <strong>in</strong>to the ongo<strong>in</strong>g effects ofResidential School<strong>in</strong>g where Canadian Aborig<strong>in</strong>al children were removed fromtheir families and communities, prevented from speak<strong>in</strong>g their own languages andlearn<strong>in</strong>g about their heritage and cultures. This highlights the <strong>in</strong>ternational effectsof colonis<strong>in</strong>g actions (Battiste 2004; Varcoe & Dick 2008).When the Royal Commission <strong>in</strong>to Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Deaths <strong>in</strong> Custody (Human Rightsand Equal Opportunities Commission - HROEC 1991) and the Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g themHome Report (Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (HROEC)2005)outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the personal and community consequences of <strong>in</strong>carceration and theremoval of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al children were released <strong>in</strong> the late 1990s, they triggeredmixed response <strong>in</strong> Australian society. Many Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people were relieved thattheir stories were f<strong>in</strong>ally heard and recorded. Many non-Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people foundthe reports shock<strong>in</strong>g and the country was divided <strong>in</strong> its response – some wantedaction, some refused to acknowledge the report, and others wondered if the claimsof atrocities were really true. Official national political recognition of thesecolonis<strong>in</strong>g actions did not occur until 13 th February 2008 when Prime M<strong>in</strong>isterKev<strong>in</strong> Rudd formally apologised to the Stolen Generations and their descendants <strong>in</strong>his first parliamentary sitt<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister. The apology was passedby both houses of Parliament (Rudd 2008; Welch 2008). There is another historicalissue however, that has not been officially recognised or apologised for at a nationalpolitical level, and that <strong>in</strong>volves denied employment opportunity and unpaid wages.Denied employment opportunitiesFor those on missions, segregation and regulation severely limited their attempts tobecome <strong>in</strong>dependent or enterpris<strong>in</strong>g, and provide for their families. Thebureaucracy, particularly the ‘Protector of the Aborig<strong>in</strong>als’ refused many requests.For example <strong>in</strong> 1916 Albert Karloan of Po<strong>in</strong>t McLeay applied for a loan of 15047

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!