12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellythis had on client expectations and experiences. However, they felt powerlessto prevent to prevent it happen<strong>in</strong>g.The right to be heardCritical questions about the Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women’s right to be heard and<strong>in</strong>fluence service delivery were raised throughout this research. Although theSouth Australian government policy documents (Government of SouthAustralia 2003b) state a commitment to community consultations, thesecommunity women did not seem to be the community people with whomhealth services were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g with. In fact, the women were attimes specifically prevented from voic<strong>in</strong>g their op<strong>in</strong>ion or shar<strong>in</strong>g theirknowledge, which placed them at a dist<strong>in</strong>ct disadvantage. As discussed byGaventa and Cornwall (2006) the shar<strong>in</strong>g or hold<strong>in</strong>g of knowledge is closelyl<strong>in</strong>ked to power and the ability act. Those <strong>in</strong> power (<strong>in</strong> this case the healthsystem) controlled what was considered to be valid knowledge (health systemrather than community knowledge) and who could be <strong>in</strong>cluded or excluded <strong>in</strong>discussions and decision mak<strong>in</strong>g through top down decision mak<strong>in</strong>g processes.This gave those <strong>in</strong> power (policy makers, fund<strong>in</strong>g bodies and managers) theability to force others (Aborig<strong>in</strong>al community women) to do what they wouldnot normally do through choice (attend selective rather than comprehensivehealth programs). With the reduction <strong>in</strong> comprehensive primary health careand community development programs, opportunities for the women to beheard, <strong>in</strong> the context of their lives, decreased.To counter this trend of non-collaboration, co-researchers and I focused oncollaborative and self empower<strong>in</strong>g activities that enabled the women torecognise, construct and share their own knowledge. <strong>Together</strong> we viewed thecurrent situation as temporary and alterable, with an underly<strong>in</strong>g belief that thewomen had the ability to change their own dest<strong>in</strong>y (at least to some degree) byconsider<strong>in</strong>g choices and options. In a process called dialogical education byFreire (1972), and connected and Midwife teach<strong>in</strong>g by Belenky and colleagues(1973), the women and I explored not only what was, but what could be.Work<strong>in</strong>g together we re<strong>in</strong>forced the women’s right to be heard, and challengedthe status quo by co-writ<strong>in</strong>g and co-present<strong>in</strong>g at well recognised peerreviewed conferences. Such activities became postcolonial transformations205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!