12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellyexperiences, and a restructur<strong>in</strong>g of stories (Atk<strong>in</strong>son 2002). Dadirri addsanother layer of heal<strong>in</strong>g and responsiveness to knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g.Challeng<strong>in</strong>g ‘Other<strong>in</strong>g’ behavioursAs described above, emancipatory knowledge <strong>in</strong>terests, Ganma and Dadirri allrequire self reflection, self awareness, and a will<strong>in</strong>gness to engage with otherpeople. Colonis<strong>in</strong>g, discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g and exclusionary practices <strong>in</strong>volvedesignat<strong>in</strong>g The Other person as someth<strong>in</strong>g different to the unspoken norm.Haraway (1988) describes this as a ‘God Trick’ used by many writers, todescribe and pa<strong>in</strong>t the Other from a position of “no-where”. Critical, fem<strong>in</strong>ist,third world, postcolonial and Indigenous writers have critiqued health carers,researchers and fem<strong>in</strong>ists who have a tendency to speak of and for ‘Others’while occlud<strong>in</strong>g (hid<strong>in</strong>g) themselves and their own <strong>in</strong>vestments and agendas(Bhabha 1992; Ch<strong>in</strong>n 2003; F<strong>in</strong>e 1994; F<strong>in</strong>e, Weis, Weseen & Wong 2000;Frankenburg 1993; hooks 1990; Ladner 1971; Moreton Rob<strong>in</strong>son 2002, 2003).Western colonial literature has often followed a trend of highlights the issuesof The Other while hid<strong>in</strong>g the writer’s own agenda (F<strong>in</strong>e 1994). In the wordsof hooks (1990, pp. 151 -2);No need to hear your voice when I can talk about you better than you canspeak about yourself. No need to hear your voice. Only tell me about yourpa<strong>in</strong>. I want to know your story. And then I will tell it back to you <strong>in</strong> a newway. Tell it back to you <strong>in</strong> such a way that it has become m<strong>in</strong>e, my own.Re-writ<strong>in</strong>g you, I write myself anew. I am still author, authority. I am stillthe coloniser, the speak subject, and you are now at the centre of my talkOther<strong>in</strong>g such as this disrupts the respectful <strong>in</strong>tention with<strong>in</strong> Ganmaknowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g and Dadirri deep listen<strong>in</strong>g.Fem<strong>in</strong>ists such as Ch<strong>in</strong>n (2003) promote the concept of embodiment <strong>in</strong>recognition that we all live <strong>in</strong> a particular body, and operate from a particularstandpo<strong>in</strong>t. Who we are and what we believe impacts on the way we live,work, provide health care, research and write. F<strong>in</strong>e (1994) describes the l<strong>in</strong>kbetween self and other as a hyphen, a space we can use to separate or mergeour personal identities with our <strong>in</strong>ventions of Others. These conceptsencourage health professionals to become more aware of their <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>in</strong>92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!