12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellyencouraged. In this new cl<strong>in</strong>ical sett<strong>in</strong>gs however, such behaviour wasconsidered to be over servic<strong>in</strong>g. The only other service available at the timewas a diabetes program. Some of the women began attend<strong>in</strong>g. However,because they were seek<strong>in</strong>g ongo<strong>in</strong>g support and connection more than thehealth content, they were at times non-compliant with the program goals andexpected outcomes. These community women did not fit neatly with<strong>in</strong> theplanned service provision and so became positioned as the Other, as difficultclients. They repeatedly sought services even through they were notparticularly ill or suffer<strong>in</strong>g a chronic condition. The local Aborig<strong>in</strong>al womensought ongo<strong>in</strong>g contact for their health and well be<strong>in</strong>g, and the Aborig<strong>in</strong>alhealth services sought to meet the complex health needs of a wider Aborig<strong>in</strong>alpopulation.Even when women focused programs were developed, the women were stillpositioned as the Other due to specific program foci. For example, theAborig<strong>in</strong>al Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Access Program (APHCAP) promoted apartnership approach with specific policies focus<strong>in</strong>g on maternal and childhealth. Unfortunately this excluded the Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women <strong>in</strong> CollaborationOne as they had older children. Follow<strong>in</strong>g program target group criteria, heathprofessionals promoted a group for young Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women at the GillesPla<strong>in</strong>s campus. The four local Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women were <strong>in</strong>formed by Aborig<strong>in</strong>al<strong>Health</strong> Workers that they were not to attend because they did not fit the criteria(as per the policy). However, what occurred was that very few young womenattended, possibly because the health service was still becom<strong>in</strong>g known andthere were few networks. There was a worker, resources and a holisticwomen’s program, but very few clients. The local Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women observedthis under-utilisation, identified their own longstand<strong>in</strong>g needs and <strong>in</strong>vitedthemselves <strong>in</strong>. The Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Mothers Group of 1999 had <strong>in</strong>cluded and valuedthe role of older women as carers of children, but <strong>in</strong> this selective primary careprogram, the women were considered to be <strong>in</strong>appropriate participants and onceaga<strong>in</strong> monopolis<strong>in</strong>g services.The extent and frequency to which <strong>in</strong>clusion or exclusion, connection orOther<strong>in</strong>g occurred was dependent upon many factors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g personalities,people’s energy levels, policies and what else was happen<strong>in</strong>g at the time. For256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!