12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kelly<strong>in</strong>dividually. Collaborative thematic analysis began with co-researchers dur<strong>in</strong>gsemi structured <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups as they <strong>in</strong>terpreted and clarifiedtheir responses to trigger questions. I conducted additional analysis us<strong>in</strong>g QSRNVivo 7 computer software and an electronic and hand written reflectivejournal (which enabled me to draw pictures more easily). All emergent themeswere taken back to co-researchers for further consideration and <strong>in</strong>corporation<strong>in</strong>to plann<strong>in</strong>g and action phases. Collaborative action <strong>in</strong>volved pool<strong>in</strong>gresources, skills and abilities and work<strong>in</strong>g together to put ideas <strong>in</strong>to action.Reflections on our action <strong>in</strong>formed the next cycle of look and listen aga<strong>in</strong>(evaluation), th<strong>in</strong>k and discuss and take action. Themes were gatheredtogether, compared and contrasted to create f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.Literature review, oral knowledge and document analysisA literature review was conducted throughout this research, search<strong>in</strong>g forliterature that both supported and challenged what was be<strong>in</strong>g discussed <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups. Review<strong>in</strong>g government, health policy andorganisational documents enabled a stronger picture of health system andorganisational priorities and culture to be built, which we then compared withwhat was happen<strong>in</strong>g around us.The literature review evolved <strong>in</strong> four stagesDur<strong>in</strong>g the first stage I read widely and spoke with many Aborig<strong>in</strong>alcommunity members and health, education, academic and researchprofessionals. In recognition that much Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and practice knowledge isoral rather than written, I considered community consultations and personalconversations as literature, as well as texts, refereed articles, conferencepresentations, project reports, government documents and policy documents. Icritically reviewed all of this <strong>in</strong>formation, further ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g my researchquestions and identify<strong>in</strong>g gaps <strong>in</strong> knowledge and literature. This early literaturereview <strong>in</strong>formed the ethics process, just as ethical considerations <strong>in</strong>formed theway the literature review evolved.The second stage developed alongside data collection and analysis activities.As new themes arose I checked that the literature I had gathered was stillrelevant and sought new literature. For example, early <strong>in</strong> the research I began131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!