12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet KellySegregation – separation and control of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al peopleRegardless of <strong>in</strong>tent, from the 1860s to 1950s Government policies led toAborig<strong>in</strong>al peoples be<strong>in</strong>g segregated from ma<strong>in</strong>stream society across Australia.With<strong>in</strong> South Australia, Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people were sent to missions, children’s homesor fr<strong>in</strong>ge settlements outside of towns and homesteads, and their lives were highlyregulated by colonial authorities. Many Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people were forcibly removedfrom their home country and sent to missions across the state (Brodie & Gale 2002;Matt<strong>in</strong>gley & Hampton 1998). Forc<strong>in</strong>g differ<strong>in</strong>g tribal and cultural groups to livealongside each other sometimes led to conflict and/or culturally unsafe situations.Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people were given very few rights or freedom of movement. They hadto seek permission to enter or leave a mission, and all their movements, f<strong>in</strong>ances,homes, supplies and marriages controlled by the mission managers, police andgovernment officials (Matt<strong>in</strong>gley & Hampton 1998). A total of 25 missions wereestablished across South Australia (Matt<strong>in</strong>gley & Hampton 1998).In 1913 the Adelaide ‘Protector of the Aborig<strong>in</strong>als’ described missions as provid<strong>in</strong>ga useful solution to ‘Aborig<strong>in</strong>al problems’. He wroteThe Aborig<strong>in</strong>es who used to <strong>in</strong>fest the city and suburbs have all been removed andplaced on Po<strong>in</strong>t McLeay, where they are kept and provided for under the Act. Theyare quite happy there and behave themselves well (Chief Protector of Aborig<strong>in</strong>als1913).He further advised the Supervisor at Po<strong>in</strong>t McLeay;The Aborig<strong>in</strong>es (both male and female) who were removed to Po<strong>in</strong>t McLeayon 31 January are not allowed to leave the Reserve without a permit fromyou…They are liable to six months imprisonment should they go away withouta permit which must not be for more than a fortnight nor extend to any townor township (<strong>in</strong> Matt<strong>in</strong>gley & Hampton 1998, p. 116).This report clearly shows the lack of choice or rights that Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people weregiven, how tightly their movements and actions were monitored and controlled, andthe role that missions played with<strong>in</strong> this. Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people were no longer free tomove across the land gather<strong>in</strong>g food, medic<strong>in</strong>es, or visit spiritual and heal<strong>in</strong>gplaces. They were also less able to control their own lives, safety and relationships.44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!