12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet Kellya possibility to be debated. All staff members supported the viewpo<strong>in</strong>texpressed <strong>in</strong> the South Australian Generational <strong>Health</strong> Review (Government ofSouth Australia 2003a), the South Australian Women’s <strong>Health</strong> Policy(Government of South Australia 2005) the ‘Close the Gap’ Campaign (OxfamAustralia 2008) and Cultural Respect (Australian <strong>Health</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister's AdvisoryCouncil 2004) that colonisation, discrim<strong>in</strong>ation and exclusion cont<strong>in</strong>ue toimpact on the lives of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people today. They sought to f<strong>in</strong>d ways toaddress these, but often found it difficult with exist<strong>in</strong>g health care approaches.The benefits of collaborative action-orientated researchEnact<strong>in</strong>g the process of PAR <strong>in</strong> this Collaboration Area highlighted theimportance of mov<strong>in</strong>g beyond <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong>to action (Habermas 1984) and(Freire 1972). Co-researchers discussed that plann<strong>in</strong>g and tak<strong>in</strong>g positive andcollaborative action helped them to ga<strong>in</strong> a sense of control and better meetunmet client needs. Interpretive approaches <strong>in</strong>crease knowledge andunderstand<strong>in</strong>g, but do not provide opportunities for pragmatic and responsiveaction and evaluation. Co-researchers valued be<strong>in</strong>g supported to try someth<strong>in</strong>gnew, without the fear of be<strong>in</strong>g blamed if it did not go to plan. If the action didnot work out, they simply evaluated it, reflected, discussed options and triedaga<strong>in</strong>. Rather than be<strong>in</strong>g the receivers of directed programs or scapegoats ifth<strong>in</strong>gs did not work out (AH D6), workers became <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> ‘ground up’programs where their knowledge and expertise was recognised and supported.In this way this research process became liberat<strong>in</strong>g and transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> wayssimilar to Freire’s (1972) Dialogical Education and Belenky and colleagues(1973) Connected and Midwife Teach<strong>in</strong>g.The PAR process also enabled health professionals to be able to focus on localAborig<strong>in</strong>al women’s priorities and f<strong>in</strong>d creative ways of address<strong>in</strong>g their needswith available and newly developed resources. <strong>Health</strong> care was able to focuson local evidence and cultural and personal needs, as well as external, topdown, pre-selected biomedical evidence. In this way PAR <strong>in</strong>creased healthprofessionals’ capacity and opportunity to provide culturally safe, responsivewomen’s health programs, m<strong>in</strong>dful of the ongo<strong>in</strong>g impacts of colonisation,discrim<strong>in</strong>ation and exclusion on Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women’s health and well be<strong>in</strong>g.259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!