12.07.2015 Views

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

Moving Forward Together in Aboriginal Women's Health: - Theses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mov<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Forward</strong> <strong>Together</strong>Janet KellyThe stolen generations – empty arms and vulnerable childrenYoung women were taken to live <strong>in</strong> children’s homes, and then sent to township orstation homes as servants. Often they were not paid <strong>in</strong> cash, and so could not ga<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>dependence (Hampton & Matt<strong>in</strong>gley 1998; Matt<strong>in</strong>gley & Hampton1998). Postcolonial and fem<strong>in</strong>ist Aborig<strong>in</strong>al authors such as Aileen MoretonRob<strong>in</strong>son (2002) highlight the role that white women played <strong>in</strong> the oppression ofAborig<strong>in</strong>al women. Challeng<strong>in</strong>g (Western) fem<strong>in</strong>ist concepts of solidarity amongwomen, she notes that many white women settlers were complicit <strong>in</strong> colonisationpractices by their actions or <strong>in</strong>actions, such as be<strong>in</strong>g violent toward Aborig<strong>in</strong>alwomen, and beat<strong>in</strong>g or punish<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> domestic situations. These behaviourswere justified by an underly<strong>in</strong>g belief that Aborig<strong>in</strong>al women were lesser be<strong>in</strong>gs,primate and unfeel<strong>in</strong>g (Moreton Rob<strong>in</strong>son 2002).The National Inquiry <strong>in</strong>to the separation of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait IslanderChildren from their families highlighted that between 1863 and 1970 approximately1 <strong>in</strong> 10 or 100,000 Aborig<strong>in</strong>al children were removed from their families acrossAustralia. For some families and communities, this meant that three successivegenerations of children were taken away (Allam 2001; Human Rights and EqualOpportunities Commission (HROEC) 2005). Huge levels of grief, loss, mistrust andself harm cont<strong>in</strong>ue to this day <strong>in</strong> response to this appall<strong>in</strong>g government practice(Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (HROEC) 2005)Two years after the National Inquiry, the Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Them Home report was released(Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (HROEC) 2005). Over 700personal stories were recorded along with wide consultations and public forums.One <strong>in</strong> five Aborig<strong>in</strong>al people reported hav<strong>in</strong>g been sexually abused while <strong>in</strong> an<strong>in</strong>stitution, a quarter of children fostered or adopted were also sexually abused. One<strong>in</strong> six spoke of excessive physical punishment.The justification for the removal of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al children by the government was thatthey would have improved opportunities, but the study found that be<strong>in</strong>g ‘removed’did not lead to higher levels of education or employment. Rather peopleexperienced <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>cidences of suicide, alcohol and substance misuse, an<strong>in</strong>ability to form relationships, <strong>in</strong>creased mental health issues, shattered familiesand communities, and difficulty <strong>in</strong> parent<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>quiry declared that the removalof Aborig<strong>in</strong>al children was primarily an act of genocide (Allam 2001; Human46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!