Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

More documents

Recommendations

Info

c. Implementation of capacity-enhancement plansMeasure Status Ready for operationCongestion statement 2011/01, Groningen – Leer route sectionBottleneck: The requested through train connection between Groningen and Leer is physically not possible onthis single-track route section in combination with the other train series.The capacity-enhancement plan concludes that the costs of the measures required to facilitate the extra throughtrain connection do not weigh up against the social benefits. No measures from the capacity-enhancement planwill thus be carried out.No measures follow from the capacityenhancementplan.- -Congestion statement 2011/02, Watergraafsmeer railway yardBottleneck: The requested stabling capacity exceeds the available stabling capacity.The capacity-enhancement plan proposes the measures below.NSR and NS Hispeed can make use ofthe facilities provided by the NS Poortarea of Amsterdam Zaanstraat.NedTrain uses the tracks on the westside of the OB since 2011 to realise 24wagon units of service and stablingcapacity for NS Hispeed rolling stock.ProRail started a “Laying of new tracksbetween track 330 and track F11 + extraservice capacity” project. Purpose of theproject is to realise 25 wagon units instabling capacity and 38 wagon units inservice capacityProRail is studying the possibility of bythe end of 2015 delivering an additional31 wagon units in stabling and servicecapacity by realising an alternativelocation for the Infratrack function andusing the released space for extendingthe stabling and service capacity. Theactivities of ProRail AM atWatergraafsmeer will be inventoried andan alternative location will be realisedwhere necessary.The improvement plan states that thefixed transportable will as of 2013 beaccommodated at the Rotterdam NoordGoederen locationImplementation of this measure to lower -the stabling requirement atWatergraafsmeer is in the hands of NSRand NS Hispeed.Realised December 2011Started; design is ready forimplementation in 2013A study into the activities of railwaycontractors has been completed. Theminimum need for contractors to beaccommodated at Watergraafsmeer is300m of stabling line (preferably dividedover 2 tracks) including railway vehicleplacement points. The remaining spacecan be used for the stabling ofpassenger stock. A study has beenstarted into the electrification of thereleased tracks. An implementationdecision is yet to be taken on thismeasure.The transport operator in question usesthe stabling capacities on theinfrastructural tracks inWatergraafsmeer. ProRail and thetransport operator in question have notunable to reach agreement on therelocation of the fixed transport toRotterdam Noord Goederen. The projecthas been stopped.4th quarter 2013-appendix 10 Infrastructure projects and studies - Section c: implementation of capacity-enhancement plansNetwork Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 140
Measure Status Ready for operationCongestion statement 2011/03, stabling capacity Hoofddorp railway yardBottleneck: The requested stabling capacity exceeds the available stabling capacity.The capacity-enhancement plan proposes the measures below.Extension of track 211 for the realisationof 14 wagon units in stabling and servicecapacity.Commissioning of a carrousel processbetween Hoofddorp stabling yard andHoofddorp station in order to realise astructural reduction in the need forcapacity of 8 to 12 wagon units.Realisation of 'Hoofddorp stabling yard,expansion stabling capacity' projectStarted 2nd quarter 2015Started 2017Congestion statement 2011/04, railway yard Amsterdam WesthavenBottleneck: The stabling capacity of Amsterdam Westhaven and the connected infrastructural yard is insufficientto facilitate the processes of the various transport operators.The capacity-enhancement plan proposes the measures below.Improve the processes and control on Started Mid 2013the basis of current information (and do itfaster than the time time formallyprescribed for a capacity-enhancementplan) + camera supervisionReroute trains that need not visit Implemented after completion of 4th quarter 2012WesthavenAziëhaven electrificationIntegral approach to the logistics chain Implemented 3th quarter 2012Stable loaded rubble trains elsewhere Implemented after capacity reallocationat Amersfoort GE2th quarter 2012Congestion statement 2012/01, convergence route section Amersfoort - BarneveldBottleneck: To facilitate transfer, Connexxion has requested scheduling in complete symmetry with the -.15 and-.4 times, including a short turn in Ede-Wageningen. The requested capacity cannot be offered on the existinginfrastructure in combination with the other requested train series on the convergence route section.The capacity-enhancement plan concludes that the expected benefits from the changed scheduling do notweigh up against the costs required to make the infrastructure suitable for the requested scheduling. Thecapacity-enhancement plan therefore does not prescribe any measures to increase capacity.No measures follow from the capacityenhancementplan.- -Congestion statement 2012/02, station ZevenaarBottleneck: NS HiSpeed and Syntus want to make use of the same time slots on track 3 in Zevenaar.Capacity analysis shows that the current Robust Track Top 50 project at Zevenaar-Didam already includesconsultation with the transport operators aimed at finding a solution for the conflict that has led to the congestionstatement. It has therefore been decided not to draw up a separate capacity analysis and capacity-enhancementplan. The capacity-enhancement plan therefore does not prescribe any measures to increase capacity.A solution is being developed in thecurrent Robust Track Top 50 project atZevenaar-DidamUncertain, yet to be determined on thebasis of questions from a supplementarycapacity analysis.Not yet knownappendix 10 Infrastructure projects and studies - Section c: implementation of capacity-enhancement plansNetwork Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 141
Page 1 and 2:
Network Statement 2014Combined Netw
Page 3 and 4:
Contents1 General information 51.1
Page 5 and 6:
1 General information1.1 Introducti
Page 7 and 8:
with due consideration for their op
Page 9 and 10:
• The tariffs have been updated o
Page 11 and 12:
Charging InformationSystem (CIS)CIS
Page 13 and 14:
2 Access conditions2.1 Introduction
Page 15 and 16:
infrastructure. A Framework Agreeme
Page 17 and 18:
2.6 Dangerous goodsThe transport of
Page 19 and 20:
3 Infrastructure3.1 IntroductionThi
Page 21 and 22:
3.2.3 Further informationThe Networ
Page 23 and 24:
CategoryAvailability / ReliabilityN
Page 25 and 26:
Exceptional Transport, subject to t
Page 27 and 28:
Table 3.4CategoryDescription of the
Page 29 and 30:
• Radiotelephone channels used fo
Page 31 and 32:
(parties who are co-responsible for
Page 33 and 34:
Maasvlakte; Valburg CUPThe above su
Page 35 and 36:
attached to the transport or handli
Page 37 and 38:
3.7 Freight terminalsThe loading an
Page 39 and 40:
CategoryLocationUser conditionsNote
Page 41 and 42:
CategoryNotesUser conditions • Th
Page 43 and 44:
4 Capacity allocation4.1 Introducti
Page 45 and 46:
4.2.2 Process in generalFour types
Page 47 and 48:
these tests could have implications
Page 49 and 50:
• or in another form to be agreed
Page 51 and 52:
- Short stabling takes precedence o
Page 53 and 54:
4.4.1.3.3 Determination of allocati
Page 55 and 56:
the required capacity. ProRail will
Page 57 and 58:
Process System Brief explanationAnn
Page 59 and 60:
allocation plan. Trains that are un
Page 61 and 62:
4.9 Allocation of capacity for serv
Page 63 and 64:
5 Services5.1 IntroductionProRail o
Page 65 and 66:
Where is the serviceprovidedApplica
Page 67 and 68:
5.3 Transfer service groupThe servi
Page 69 and 70:
Delivery termsUser conditionsA rese
Page 71 and 72:
TariffDelivery termsUser conditions
Page 73 and 74:
Availability / Reliability7 x 24 ho
Page 75 and 76:
5.5.8 Information on customised tra
Page 77 and 78:
that determines the amount of elect
Page 79 and 80:
6 Charges6.1 IntroductionThis chapt
Page 81 and 82:
- The affected infrastructure is th
Page 83 and 84:
The applicable train stop code is d
Page 86 and 87:
Supplementary to the railway stated
Page 88 and 89:
TermCapacity AgreementCentrally con
Page 90 and 91: TermRailway yardRefuelling systemRN
Page 92 and 93: TermTrain slotDefinitionA train slo
Page 94 and 95: (empty page)appendix 2 DefinitionsN
Page 96 and 97: (empty page)appendix 3 Consultation
Page 98 and 99: (empty page)appendix 4 General Regu
Page 100 and 101: (empty page)appendix 5 Model Access
Page 102 and 103: undertaking by making use of the de
Page 104 and 105: 2. Capacity allocated in the form o
Page 106 and 107: party causing the disruption. The p
Page 108 and 109: . In case of personal injury and fi
Page 110 and 111: 5. This article is a third-party cl
Page 112 and 113: 2. The network manager can terminat
Page 114 and 115: network manager in connection with
Page 116 and 117: Order handling from 36 hours to 1 h
Page 118 and 119: As soon as a driver has completed a
Page 120 and 121: d. Refuelling at a railway yard sub
Page 122 and 123: No. SubaspectResponsibility8 Altern
Page 124 and 125: appendix 7 Transport and operating
Page 126 and 127: (empty page)appendix 7 Transport an
Page 128 and 129: ProRail will provide a railway unde
Page 130 and 131: (empty page)appendix 8 ReportsNetwo
Page 132 and 133: Passenger transport restrictionsThe
Page 134 and 135: a. Infrastructure projectsList of p
Page 136 and 137: List of planning dates function cha
Page 138 and 139: List of planning dates function cha
Page 142 and 143: Measure Status Ready for operationC
Page 144 and 145: appendix 10 Infrastructure projects
Page 146 and 147: (empty page)appendix 11 Information
Page 148 and 149: NotesSpecial loading gaugesThe spec
Page 150 and 151: (empty page)appendix 13 Axle loads
Page 152 and 153: (empty page)appendix 14 Train contr
Page 154 and 155: (empty page)appendix 15 Train detec
Page 156 and 157: (empty page)appendix 16 Route secti
Page 158 and 159: Voltage change-over gates Betuwe Ro
Page 160 and 161: List of moveable railroad bridgesNo
Page 162 and 163: (empty page)appendix 18 Moveable ra
Page 164 and 165: (empty page)appendix 19 Platform le
Page 166 and 167: (empty page)appendix 20 Public load
Page 168 and 169: Information on the storage capacity
Page 170 and 171: 2.2 Interval and intersection times
Page 172 and 173: Table 3Intersection time in the opp
Page 174 and 175: Examplesappendix 22 Timetable draft
Page 176 and 177: appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 178 and 179: appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 180 and 181: (empty page)appendix 22 Timetable d
Page 182 and 183: 2 Description of the Path Coordinat
Page 184 and 185: CategoryDelivery termsUser conditio
Page 186 and 187: 2 Description of the report on insi
Page 188 and 189: (empty page)appendix 24 Application
Page 190 and 191:
(empty page)appendix 25 Services co
Page 192 and 193:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 194 and 195:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 196 and 197:
(empty page)appendix 26 Stations (
Page 198 and 199:
(empty page)appendix 27 Performance
Page 200:
Route sectionCompensationtariffBreu
show all

Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?