Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 The applicants involved are invited to further consultation on the situation, possibly with ascheduling proposal by ProRail as point of departure.3 All applicants involved are invited to submit proposals for solution.4 Solutions must fit within the usability of the infrastructure, taking into consideration drafting norms,user restrictions such as noise, rail safety and external safety.5 The maintenance roster is included in the draft timetable.6 The objective is to find solutions in which (in order of priority and taking process rule 4 intoaccount) the capacity application is granted as much as possible, the commercial and operationalrelationship within the requested capacity is disrupted as little as possible, and the economicconsequences of deviations from the requested capacity are as limited as possible. The statutorypriority rules are not applied in seeking solutions.7 The border-crossing times agreed upon with the context of RNE are maintained as much aspossible.8 The minimum available capacity for ad hoc applications for international freight transport andprivate passenger transport is included in the capacity allocation. This capacity ensues from thelegal 55 norm.9 The proposals presented by ProRail will be compatible with the timetable measures as included incapacity-enhancement plans.10 ProRail monitors the stable viability of the timetable on the basis of the drafting norms in appendix22 as well as the effective utilisation of the infrastructure.11 A safety evaluation is required in case of deviations from the drafting norms regarding interval andintersection times. The applicable procedure is available on the website of ProRail (www.prorail.nl> vervoerders > capaciteitsverdeling > dienstregeling).ProRail makes a draft timetable representing the provisional outcome of the scheduling andcoordination process. This draft timetable will during a period of one month be made available forinspection, whereby ProRail will give due consideration to any comments thereon.CoordinationCoordination is a process of consultation between equal partners. In case of competing applications,the parties involved will make every reasonable effort to find a solution. While doing so, they willprovide transparency with regard to the commercial and economic interests involved. In case ofapplications by titleholders that compete with one another, ProRail can attempt to reach agreement byraising the user charge 56 . The surcharge will be calculated in accordance with Chapter 6.2 ‘Surchargefor scarcity of capacity’.If the applicants involved and/or ProRail are unable to reach agreement, ProRail establishes thatapplications have not been satisfactorily processed and declares the infrastructure involved ascongested.In order to find a solution, an appeal can be made to the regulations on the settlement of disputeseither before or after the surcharge is imposed (see Chapter 4.4.2).Following a congestion statement, allocation by ProRail takes place with application of the statutorypriority rules:1 For traffic/transport situations in accordance with Sections 7, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of the RailwaysCapacity Allocation Decree.2 For traffic/transport situations in accordance with Section 9 of the Railways Capacity AllocationDecree.3 If the priority rules of the Railway Capacity Allocation Decree are insufficiently distinctive, thefollowing supplementary priority rules apply:- Transport takes precedence over traffic.- Empty rolling stock transport takes precedence over stabling- Stabling of rolling stock that is used daily for transport purposes takes precedence over rollingstock that is not used daily (e.g., rolling stock scheduled for demolition, rolling stock scheduledfor new use).5556Section 13 Paragraph 3 Railway Capacity Allocation DecreeIn accordance with Section 7 Paragraph 1 Railways Capacity Allocation DecreeNetwork Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 50
- Short stabling takes precedence over longer stabling, whereby in case of conflicts betweenpassenger trains, stabling shorter than 12 hours takes precedence over stabling longer than12 hours. If both applications are for stabling shorter than 12 hours, the first prioritisation willbe based on Section 8 of the Railway Capacity Allocation Decree, followed by the applicationof economic considerations if necessary.- Accommodate the highest possible utilisation (traffic/transport/stabling) within the applicableenvironmental capacity restrictions (noise/risk).- Full utilization of the noise capacity has priority over full utilization of the risk capacity forexternal safety.Capacity for workIn case of scheduled work on or near the network, which require (a combination of) incidentalpossessions, the following supplementary conditions apply:1 In so far as the work is reasonably foreseeable and plannable on the closing date for annualtimetable applications, the capacity for performance of the work is scheduled and allocated duringthe annual timetable allocation process. If work is not reasonably foreseeable and plannable,agreement on the day type and performance variant may be reached during the annual timetablephase. These are entered in RADAR and serve as basis for the ad hoc phase.2 The coordination of the capacity allocation for the annual timetable is preceded by an inventory ofyet to be agreed possessions on the Combined Network, the Betuwe Route and the border routesections of neighbouring railway networks, for which it is expected that the relevant detour routeswill offer insufficient rest capacity to cope with the affected trains. For those possessions of whichit is expected after consultation that they cannot be accommodated within the total capacity of thedetour routes, ProRail provides titleholders the possibility to designate trains for processingaccording to the timetable process rules in the VAB process (traffic changes for managementpurposes), and thus with priority over other ad hoc applications. See also Chapter 4.4.1.4.3 The maintenance roster remains applicable during and at the location of the incidentalpossessions, as well as the related detour routes, unless explicitly stated otherwise. ProRail will, ifpossible, contribute towards resolving the competition by making changes to the maintenanceroster.Compensation in case of possessionsProRail can within the context of the annual timetable allocation process for work on the infrastructureagree on a financial compensation to titleholders other than in the form of user charges. Under thecondition that the alternative transport plan is workable and socially capable, this compensationagreement is chosen together with the preferred possession variant drawn up by ProRail, subject tothe conditions below.1 Newbuild worksa. In case of scheduled newbuild works, the out-of-pocket costs of replacement transport arecompensated on the basis of quotes agreed between the transport operator and ProRail.b. In case of scheduled newbuild works, no compensation is paid for detoured passenger andfreight trains. ProRail shall endeavour to avoid incidental possessions on the detour route asdefined in the Corridor Book.2 Modernisation worksa. Passenger transport operators can, in case of scheduled modernisation works (large-scalemaintenance and renewal) qualify for compensation, in the instances and to the degreedescribed below.i. No compensation is provided in case of possessions during weekends, night-time,offpeak hours, low traffic periods (i.e. school holidays and official public holidays) orwhen the through train traffic is not affected.ii. Compensation is provided if and in so far as a possession (partly) falls during normalworking days (not low passenger traffic periods) and if the morning and/or evening peaktimes are affected. Compensation then applies to the cancelled train kilometres of thetrains during those working days.iii. The total of the financial compensation is calculated on the basis of an amount percancelled train kilometre as a result of the possession, compared with the situationallocated in the annual timetable.iv. The compensation tariff for passenger transport depends on the category to which theaffected route section is allocated according to appendix 28 and amounts to:Network Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 51
Page 1 and 2: Network Statement 2014Combined Netw
Page 3 and 4: Contents1 General information 51.1
Page 5 and 6: 1 General information1.1 Introducti
Page 7 and 8: with due consideration for their op
Page 9 and 10: • The tariffs have been updated o
Page 11 and 12: Charging InformationSystem (CIS)CIS
Page 13 and 14: 2 Access conditions2.1 Introduction
Page 15 and 16: infrastructure. A Framework Agreeme
Page 17 and 18: 2.6 Dangerous goodsThe transport of
Page 19 and 20: 3 Infrastructure3.1 IntroductionThi
Page 21 and 22: 3.2.3 Further informationThe Networ
Page 23 and 24: CategoryAvailability / ReliabilityN
Page 25 and 26: Exceptional Transport, subject to t
Page 27 and 28: Table 3.4CategoryDescription of the
Page 29 and 30: • Radiotelephone channels used fo
Page 31 and 32: (parties who are co-responsible for
Page 33 and 34: Maasvlakte; Valburg CUPThe above su
Page 35 and 36: attached to the transport or handli
Page 37 and 38: 3.7 Freight terminalsThe loading an
Page 39 and 40: CategoryLocationUser conditionsNote
Page 41 and 42: CategoryNotesUser conditions • Th
Page 43 and 44: 4 Capacity allocation4.1 Introducti
Page 45 and 46: 4.2.2 Process in generalFour types
Page 47 and 48: these tests could have implications
Page 49: • or in another form to be agreed
Page 53 and 54: 4.4.1.3.3 Determination of allocati
Page 55 and 56: the required capacity. ProRail will
Page 57 and 58: Process System Brief explanationAnn
Page 59 and 60: allocation plan. Trains that are un
Page 61 and 62: 4.9 Allocation of capacity for serv
Page 63 and 64: 5 Services5.1 IntroductionProRail o
Page 65 and 66: Where is the serviceprovidedApplica
Page 67 and 68: 5.3 Transfer service groupThe servi
Page 69 and 70: Delivery termsUser conditionsA rese
Page 71 and 72: TariffDelivery termsUser conditions
Page 73 and 74: Availability / Reliability7 x 24 ho
Page 75 and 76: 5.5.8 Information on customised tra
Page 77 and 78: that determines the amount of elect
Page 79 and 80: 6 Charges6.1 IntroductionThis chapt
Page 81 and 82: - The affected infrastructure is th
Page 83 and 84: The applicable train stop code is d
Page 86 and 87: Supplementary to the railway stated
Page 88 and 89: TermCapacity AgreementCentrally con
Page 90 and 91: TermRailway yardRefuelling systemRN
Page 92 and 93: TermTrain slotDefinitionA train slo
Page 94 and 95: (empty page)appendix 2 DefinitionsN
Page 96 and 97: (empty page)appendix 3 Consultation
Page 98 and 99: (empty page)appendix 4 General Regu
Page 100 and 101:
(empty page)appendix 5 Model Access
Page 102 and 103:
undertaking by making use of the de
Page 104 and 105:
2. Capacity allocated in the form o
Page 106 and 107:
party causing the disruption. The p
Page 108 and 109:
. In case of personal injury and fi
Page 110 and 111:
5. This article is a third-party cl
Page 112 and 113:
2. The network manager can terminat
Page 114 and 115:
network manager in connection with
Page 116 and 117:
Order handling from 36 hours to 1 h
Page 118 and 119:
As soon as a driver has completed a
Page 120 and 121:
d. Refuelling at a railway yard sub
Page 122 and 123:
No. SubaspectResponsibility8 Altern
Page 124 and 125:
appendix 7 Transport and operating
Page 126 and 127:
(empty page)appendix 7 Transport an
Page 128 and 129:
ProRail will provide a railway unde
Page 130 and 131:
(empty page)appendix 8 ReportsNetwo
Page 132 and 133:
Passenger transport restrictionsThe
Page 134 and 135:
a. Infrastructure projectsList of p
Page 136 and 137:
List of planning dates function cha
Page 138 and 139:
List of planning dates function cha
Page 140 and 141:
c. Implementation of capacity-enhan
Page 142 and 143:
Measure Status Ready for operationC
Page 144 and 145:
appendix 10 Infrastructure projects
Page 146 and 147:
(empty page)appendix 11 Information
Page 148 and 149:
NotesSpecial loading gaugesThe spec
Page 150 and 151:
(empty page)appendix 13 Axle loads
Page 152 and 153:
(empty page)appendix 14 Train contr
Page 154 and 155:
(empty page)appendix 15 Train detec
Page 156 and 157:
(empty page)appendix 16 Route secti
Page 158 and 159:
Voltage change-over gates Betuwe Ro
Page 160 and 161:
List of moveable railroad bridgesNo
Page 162 and 163:
(empty page)appendix 18 Moveable ra
Page 164 and 165:
(empty page)appendix 19 Platform le
Page 166 and 167:
(empty page)appendix 20 Public load
Page 168 and 169:
Information on the storage capacity
Page 170 and 171:
2.2 Interval and intersection times
Page 172 and 173:
Table 3Intersection time in the opp
Page 174 and 175:
Examplesappendix 22 Timetable draft
Page 176 and 177:
appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 178 and 179:
appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 180 and 181:
(empty page)appendix 22 Timetable d
Page 182 and 183:
2 Description of the Path Coordinat
Page 184 and 185:
CategoryDelivery termsUser conditio
Page 186 and 187:
2 Description of the report on insi
Page 188 and 189:
(empty page)appendix 24 Application
Page 190 and 191:
(empty page)appendix 25 Services co
Page 192 and 193:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 194 and 195:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 196 and 197:
(empty page)appendix 26 Stations (
Page 198 and 199:
(empty page)appendix 27 Performance
Page 200:
Route sectionCompensationtariffBreu
show all

Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?