Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Measure Status Ready for operationCongestion statement 2012/03, station LeeuwardenBottleneck: NS Reizigers has requested capacity at track 3 for train servicing, Arriva has requested capacity attrack 3 for its regular train service.The capacity-enhancement plan concludes that the current Robust Track project in Leeuwarden alreadyincludes consultation with the transport operators aimed at finding a solution for the conflict that has led to thecongestion statement. It is therefore been decided not to study this capacity conflict separately but to incorporateit in the current Robust Track project at Leeuwarden.A solution is being developed in thecurrent Robust Track Top 50 project atLeeuwarden.Investment decision is expected 4thquarter 2012.Not yet knownCongestion statement 2012/04, station GroningenBottleneck: NS Reizigers has requested capacity at track 7a for train servicing, Arriva has requested capacity attrack 7a for its regular train service.The capacity-enhancement plan ascertains that an operational solution for the bottleneck as referred to in thecongestion statement will be provided in the short term.It is assumed for the longer term that the Samenwerkingsverband Noord Nederland (SNN) will initiate a changeto the Groningen railway yard. This change will include an increase in the available stabling and servicecapacity.The bottleneck is detailed in projectGroningen, SpoorknoopStarted 4th quarter 2019Congestion statement 2012/05, route section Zwolle – CoevordenBottleneck: NS Reizigers has requested capacity for running a half-hourly service on the route section. RRF hasrequested capacity for running 32 freight trains per week to and from Coevorden. Bentheimer Eisenbahn hasrequested capacity for running 31 freight trains per week to and from Coevorden. The requested capacity cannotbe provided on the route section.The capacity-enhancement plan states that the bottleneck will no longer occur in 2013. No measures from thecapacity-enhancement plan will thus be carried out.No measures follow from the capacityenhancementplan.- -Congestion statement 2012/06, VenloBottleneck: The environmental permit provides no noise capacity in the period from Saturday 00:00 until Sunday24:00 to change locomotives of freight trains that arrive at and depart from Venlo.The capacity-enhancement plan states that a process has been initiated to request (an amendment to) theenvironmental permit. The requested capacity appears to fall within the noise capacity requested by ProRail.Application for (a revision of) theenvironmental permitCongestion statement 2012/07, NijmegenChanging locomotives is as of 2 April2012 regarded as part of through traintraffic. The bottleneck is hereby resolved.April 2012Bottleneck: The environmental permit provides insufficient noise capacity to perform the requested capacity inservice processes.The capacity-enhancement plan states that a process has been initiated to request (an amendment to) theenvironmental permit. The requested capacity appears to fall within the noise capacity requested by ProRail.Application for (a revision of) theenvironmental permitApplication submitted on 11 July 2012 December 2012appendix 10 Infrastructure projects and studies - Section c: implementation of capacity-enhancement plansNetwork Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 142
Measure Status Ready for operationCongestion statement 2012/08, Amersfoort BokkeduinenBottleneck: The environmental permit provides insufficient noise capacity to perform the requested capacity inservice processes.The capacity-enhancement plan states that a process has been initiated to request (an amendment to) theenvironmental permit. The requested capacity appears to fall within the noise capacity requested by ProRail.Application for (a revision of) theenvironmental permitCongestion statement 2012/09, HaarlemApplication submitted on 19 October2011September 2012Bottleneck: The environmental permit provides insufficient noise capacity to perform the requested capacity inservice processes.The capacity-enhancement plan states that a process has been initiated to request (an amendment to) theenvironmental permit. The requested capacity appears to fall within the noise capacity requested by ProRail.Application for (a revision of) theenvironmental permitApplication submitted on 3 May 2012 October 2012Congestion statement 2012/10, BornBottleneck: As no environmental permit has been issued for Born, capacity requested by transport operators thatfalls under the Environmental Management Act is not permitted.The capacity-enhancement plan states that a process has been initiated to request (an amendment to) theenvironmental permit. The requested capacity appears to fall within the noise capacity requested by ProRail.Application for (a revision of) theenvironmental permitThe competent authority has given atolerance decision. As a result, thebottleneck is resolved for now. Theapplication for environmental permit hasbeen submitted.Congestion statement 2012/11, route Lutterade – Emmen2012Bottleneck: DB Schenker has requested capacity for the daily running of a freight train from Lutterade DSM toEmmen (return) The requested scheduling and routing lead to a capacity conflict with the maintenance roster onthe route sections Zutphen – Hengelo and Roermond - Nijmegen, the setting back in Hengelo leads tottransgression of the environmental capacity, noise exceeding on various route section and a conflict betweenthe stabling of passenger stock and shunting processes of the freight transport operator in Emmen.The capacity-enhancement plan states that rerouting via Emmen – Zwolle – Amersfoort – Utrecht – Eindhoven –Sittard – Lutterade would remove the conflicts.Rerouting via Emmen – Zwolle –Amersfoort – Utrecht – Eindhoven –Sittard - LutteradeImplemented 2012Congestion statement 2014/01, converging route section Arnhem – Nijmegen/TielBottleneck: NSR requests an intercity 6*/h and a slow train 4*/h on the Arnhem – Nijmegen route section.Arnhem – Nijmegen Urban Region and the Province of Gelderland request a Tiel – Arnhem slow train 2*/hduring peak hours and 1*/h during off-peak hours. A freight path is defined 2*/h for freight transport. Therequested capacity cannot be offered on the route section and they may also be insufficient platform capacity inArnhem and Nijmegen.The capacity-enhancement plan states that the benefits of the capacity increased do not weigh up against thecosts involved in realising the capacity improvement. No measures from the capacity-enhancement plan willthus be carried out.No measures follow from the capacityenhancementplan.- -appendix 10 Infrastructure projects and studies - Section c: implementation of capacity-enhancement plansNetwork Statement 2014 Combined Network - version 1.0 dated 9 January 2013 page 143
Page 1 and 2:
Network Statement 2014Combined Netw
Page 3 and 4:
Contents1 General information 51.1
Page 5 and 6:
1 General information1.1 Introducti
Page 7 and 8:
with due consideration for their op
Page 9 and 10:
• The tariffs have been updated o
Page 11 and 12:
Charging InformationSystem (CIS)CIS
Page 13 and 14:
2 Access conditions2.1 Introduction
Page 15 and 16:
infrastructure. A Framework Agreeme
Page 17 and 18:
2.6 Dangerous goodsThe transport of
Page 19 and 20:
3 Infrastructure3.1 IntroductionThi
Page 21 and 22:
3.2.3 Further informationThe Networ
Page 23 and 24:
CategoryAvailability / ReliabilityN
Page 25 and 26:
Exceptional Transport, subject to t
Page 27 and 28:
Table 3.4CategoryDescription of the
Page 29 and 30:
• Radiotelephone channels used fo
Page 31 and 32:
(parties who are co-responsible for
Page 33 and 34:
Maasvlakte; Valburg CUPThe above su
Page 35 and 36:
attached to the transport or handli
Page 37 and 38:
3.7 Freight terminalsThe loading an
Page 39 and 40:
CategoryLocationUser conditionsNote
Page 41 and 42:
CategoryNotesUser conditions • Th
Page 43 and 44:
4 Capacity allocation4.1 Introducti
Page 45 and 46:
4.2.2 Process in generalFour types
Page 47 and 48:
these tests could have implications
Page 49 and 50:
• or in another form to be agreed
Page 51 and 52:
- Short stabling takes precedence o
Page 53 and 54:
4.4.1.3.3 Determination of allocati
Page 55 and 56:
the required capacity. ProRail will
Page 57 and 58:
Process System Brief explanationAnn
Page 59 and 60:
allocation plan. Trains that are un
Page 61 and 62:
4.9 Allocation of capacity for serv
Page 63 and 64:
5 Services5.1 IntroductionProRail o
Page 65 and 66:
Where is the serviceprovidedApplica
Page 67 and 68:
5.3 Transfer service groupThe servi
Page 69 and 70:
Delivery termsUser conditionsA rese
Page 71 and 72:
TariffDelivery termsUser conditions
Page 73 and 74:
Availability / Reliability7 x 24 ho
Page 75 and 76:
5.5.8 Information on customised tra
Page 77 and 78:
that determines the amount of elect
Page 79 and 80:
6 Charges6.1 IntroductionThis chapt
Page 81 and 82:
- The affected infrastructure is th
Page 83 and 84:
The applicable train stop code is d
Page 86 and 87:
Supplementary to the railway stated
Page 88 and 89:
TermCapacity AgreementCentrally con
Page 90 and 91:
TermRailway yardRefuelling systemRN
Page 92 and 93: TermTrain slotDefinitionA train slo
Page 94 and 95: (empty page)appendix 2 DefinitionsN
Page 96 and 97: (empty page)appendix 3 Consultation
Page 98 and 99: (empty page)appendix 4 General Regu
Page 100 and 101: (empty page)appendix 5 Model Access
Page 102 and 103: undertaking by making use of the de
Page 104 and 105: 2. Capacity allocated in the form o
Page 106 and 107: party causing the disruption. The p
Page 108 and 109: . In case of personal injury and fi
Page 110 and 111: 5. This article is a third-party cl
Page 112 and 113: 2. The network manager can terminat
Page 114 and 115: network manager in connection with
Page 116 and 117: Order handling from 36 hours to 1 h
Page 118 and 119: As soon as a driver has completed a
Page 120 and 121: d. Refuelling at a railway yard sub
Page 122 and 123: No. SubaspectResponsibility8 Altern
Page 124 and 125: appendix 7 Transport and operating
Page 126 and 127: (empty page)appendix 7 Transport an
Page 128 and 129: ProRail will provide a railway unde
Page 130 and 131: (empty page)appendix 8 ReportsNetwo
Page 132 and 133: Passenger transport restrictionsThe
Page 134 and 135: a. Infrastructure projectsList of p
Page 136 and 137: List of planning dates function cha
Page 138 and 139: List of planning dates function cha
Page 140 and 141: c. Implementation of capacity-enhan
Page 144 and 145: appendix 10 Infrastructure projects
Page 146 and 147: (empty page)appendix 11 Information
Page 148 and 149: NotesSpecial loading gaugesThe spec
Page 150 and 151: (empty page)appendix 13 Axle loads
Page 152 and 153: (empty page)appendix 14 Train contr
Page 154 and 155: (empty page)appendix 15 Train detec
Page 156 and 157: (empty page)appendix 16 Route secti
Page 158 and 159: Voltage change-over gates Betuwe Ro
Page 160 and 161: List of moveable railroad bridgesNo
Page 162 and 163: (empty page)appendix 18 Moveable ra
Page 164 and 165: (empty page)appendix 19 Platform le
Page 166 and 167: (empty page)appendix 20 Public load
Page 168 and 169: Information on the storage capacity
Page 170 and 171: 2.2 Interval and intersection times
Page 172 and 173: Table 3Intersection time in the opp
Page 174 and 175: Examplesappendix 22 Timetable draft
Page 176 and 177: appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 178 and 179: appendix 22 Timetable drafting norm
Page 180 and 181: (empty page)appendix 22 Timetable d
Page 182 and 183: 2 Description of the Path Coordinat
Page 184 and 185: CategoryDelivery termsUser conditio
Page 186 and 187: 2 Description of the report on insi
Page 188 and 189: (empty page)appendix 24 Application
Page 190 and 191: (empty page)appendix 25 Services co
Page 192 and 193:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 194 and 195:
Name of the stationStation category
Page 196 and 197:
(empty page)appendix 26 Stations (
Page 198 and 199:
(empty page)appendix 27 Performance
Page 200:
Route sectionCompensationtariffBreu
show all

Network Statement 2014 - ProRail

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?