25.09.2015 Views

Changing public space

Changing public space

Changing public space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6.3 Timeline of developments at the Beurstraverse<br />

Year<br />

Developments<br />

1940 Bombardment of the city centre of Rotterdam<br />

1940s-1960s Reconstruction of the Beursplein and Van Oldebarneveltplaats<br />

1984 C&A contacts Multivastgoed to redevelop its department store. Multi sees opportunities to turn<br />

the upgrading of the store into a large redevelopment project and contacts the municipality to<br />

talk about possible redevelopment plans.<br />

1992 First official indication of the Beursplein project in policy document (dS+V et al., 1993)<br />

1993 Agreement between the local government, investor Nationale Nederlanden and Multi<br />

Development Corporation to set up a joint consortium (Gemeente Rotterdam, 1993)<br />

1994 Start construction work<br />

1996 Opening of the Beurstraverse<br />

Source: based on Interviews (2006)<br />

the retail floor <strong>space</strong>. Besides, the core shopping centre suffered from being dissected by a busy<br />

traffic artery, the Coolsingel. To get around these problems, the Beurstraverse was laid out as<br />

a 300-metre-long sunken underpass connecting two existing retail squares – the Beursplein<br />

and Van Oldenbarneveltplaats – which were previously separated by the Coolsingel. As such,<br />

it was nicknamed the Koopgoot (‘Shopping trench’). The construction of the Beurstraverse<br />

created 60.000m 2 retail <strong>space</strong> divided among 95 shops; in addition 450 parking <strong>space</strong>s and 106<br />

apartments were added. Because it provides access to the metro station, the Beurstraverse cannot<br />

be closed off at night. Lying below grade, it is visually separated from the adjacent <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>s.<br />

But the passage also differs from its surroundings in another sense. It is owned and operated by<br />

a consortium that includes the ING Bank and a pension fund, along with the local government<br />

(Bergenhenegouwen & Van Weesep, 2003). The daily maintenance and supervision is contractedout<br />

to Actys (formerly known as Dynamis), a private management company. In contrast, most of<br />

the adjacent area is entirely in the <strong>public</strong> domain, so it is operated and maintained by municipal<br />

services. The consortium subjects the users to tight restrictions: no alcoholic beverages, no street<br />

vendors, no bicycles, no loitering, and so on. The rules are clearly posted on signs at the entrances;<br />

numerous cameras and private security guards are in place to enforce them.<br />

The initiative to redevelop the Beursplein and Van Oldenbarneveltplaats did not come from the<br />

municipality, but from the side of the private sector. The C&A, a retail conglomerate of Dutch<br />

origin, owned a major store at the Beursplein. By 1984 it did not meet C&A’s requirements<br />

anymore, although the building was constructed only after the Second World War. Therefore, the<br />

board of directors contacted developer Multi to upgrade the store. However, Multi envisioned<br />

that the upgrading of C&A’s property could be extended to the surrounding areas, turning the<br />

reconstruction of a single building into a large redevelopment project. At the same time, the<br />

local government was still in the midst of redeveloping the Schouwburgplein and Museumpark.<br />

In addition, it was focussing on the redevelopment of the Lijnbaan to improve the city’s<br />

retail function. However, the municipal authorities became interested in Multi’s plans for the<br />

Beurstraverse when the negotiation with the property owners of the Lijnbaan deadlocked. They<br />

reasoned that if the property owners of the Lijnbaan could not be enticed directly to improve<br />

their property, perhaps increased competition of a new shopping street could trigger them. In<br />

addition, the local government acknowledged that strengthening the city centre’s retail function<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!