Changing public space
Changing public space
Changing public space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 Fear and fantasy in the cases<br />
7.1 Introduction<br />
Public <strong>space</strong>s in Dutch city centres are increasingly affected by measures to reduce feelings of<br />
fear on the one hand, and by a focus on fantasy on the other hand. This is the main conclusion<br />
of Chapter 3 based on current discourses in academic literature. To find out to what extent fear<br />
and fantasy are manifest in the cases, the two concepts need to be operationalised and visualised.<br />
For this purpose, an analytical tool in the form of six-dimensional diagrams was developed and<br />
introduced in Section 5.4. The next sections describe the level of fear and fantasy in the <strong>public</strong><br />
<strong>space</strong>s of the case-study cities by depicting these trends in six-dimensional diagrams. Each<br />
research object has its own diagram. Section 7.6 brings all diagrams together in order to compare<br />
the projects and to detect patterns between the intensities of secured and themed dimensions<br />
and the level of private-sector involvement.<br />
7.2 Fear and fantasy in Rotterdam<br />
In their article named Public <strong>space</strong> on a slippery slope, Van Aalst and Bergenhenegouwen (2003,<br />
title translated from Dutch by the author) conclude that the Beurstraverse has been transformed<br />
into a counter locale, a term coined by sociologist Lyn Lofland (1998) to refer to <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
becoming more private due to surveillance, strict regulation, and private security. They base their<br />
argument on the fact that the Beurstraverse is monitored by many cameras and subject to strict<br />
regulation. Does this imply that the Beurstraverse can be classified as secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>?<br />
When applying the six-dimensional diagrams to <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>s in Rotterdam it appears that<br />
the Schouwburgplein and Beurstraverse show very different profiles. Figure 7.1 indicates that<br />
the Schouwburgplein can be considered a themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>, because the coverage is more<br />
complete in the lower part of the circle than in the upper part. Its ratings on secured dimensions<br />
are relatively low. Previously two cameras scanned the area, but they have been removed. The area<br />
cannot be closed off and there are comfortable designer benches to lounge on. Therefore, it has<br />
a low intensity regarding ‘restraints on loitering’. The Schouwburgplein gets a medium rating<br />
on the dimension ‘regulation’. Since the summer of 2004, the square has served as a test case for<br />
co-operation between civil security guards (in Dutch called stadswacht), the police, and private<br />
security companies. In December 2004, this experiment was deemed a success and this format<br />
of safety management has been extended to other <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>s in Rotterdam (Rotterdams<br />
Dagblad, 2004). Since, the Schouwburgplein is subject to the regular local ordinance, yet<br />
supervised by private security guards in co-operation with the local police.<br />
With regard to the themed dimensions, the Schouwburgplein shows higher intensities.<br />
It is one of eight locations for large-scale events in Rotterdam. The square is regularly used as<br />
a venue for concerts, outdoor film screenings, and other events. Its design has been altered to<br />
147