Changing public space
Changing public space
Changing public space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Squares redesigned by<br />
<strong>public</strong> sector<br />
Squares redesigned by<br />
<strong>public</strong> and private sector (PPP)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
1. Surveillance<br />
2. Restraints on loitering<br />
3. Regulation<br />
Themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
4. Events<br />
5. Funshopping<br />
6. Sidewalk cafés<br />
6<br />
4<br />
6<br />
4<br />
5<br />
5<br />
Schouwburgplein<br />
Grote Markt<br />
Oude Markt<br />
Markt<br />
Beurstraverse<br />
Statenplein<br />
Van Heekplein<br />
Loeffplein<br />
7092<br />
Figure 7.5 Six-dimensional profiles of all research objects as secured (upper half ) or themed<br />
(lower half ) <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> (Loeffplein including the Arena is left out)<br />
was completed without involvement of the private sector. The Markt and Van Heekplein both<br />
function as market place, but differ with respect to the actors involved in the redevelopment;<br />
while the Markt will be redesigned without any private-sector involvement, the Van Heekplein<br />
was upgraded with an abundance of private actors (see Table 5.3). To find out to what extent the<br />
differences and similarities in terms of fear versus fantasy can be linked to variations in terms<br />
of <strong>public</strong> versus PPP developments, the diagrams of the eight research objects are combined<br />
in Figure 7.5. The projects are grouped on the basis of their main function (non-retail or retail<br />
squares) and actors involved in the redesign process (only <strong>public</strong> sector or PPP). Because these<br />
groups completely overlap, only the latter is indicated in the heading of the diagrams.<br />
The most striking outcome of Figure 7.5 is that <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>s redesigned by both the <strong>public</strong><br />
and the private sector (PPP squares) without exception show high ratings on the dimension<br />
‘funshopping’. This might not be surprising, because the inventory of redeveloped city squares<br />
already revealed that the involvement of the private sector is almost entirely restricted to<br />
retail squares (Section 5.2.3). However, not every retail square necessarily has high ratings on<br />
funshopping. There are neighbourhood squares outside the city centre that have a retail function,<br />
which Klaassen (1994) defines as facility squares (Section 2.6). These squares often consist of<br />
parking <strong>space</strong> surrounded by shops with a dominant ‘run’ nature such as supermarkets and<br />
convenience stores with low-order assortments. However, within city centres – at least in<br />
our case-study cities – retail squares are prime locations for funshopping. Because of this<br />
homogeneous outcome, it is safe to conclude that retail is an important, if not compulsory<br />
precondition for the private sector to become involved in the redevelopment of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. This<br />
preference to participate in retail redevelopment projects is also observed in international real<br />
estate literature. Adair et al. (2003), for example, found that retail property performs extremely<br />
well within regeneration areas, which appear to be particularly suited to shopping centres and<br />
retail warehousing investments. Section 8.2.2 describes the role and objectives of the private<br />
156