25.09.2015 Views

Changing public space

Changing public space

Changing public space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Squares redesigned by<br />

<strong>public</strong> sector<br />

Squares redesigned by<br />

<strong>public</strong> and private sector (PPP)<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

1. Surveillance<br />

2. Restraints on loitering<br />

3. Regulation<br />

Themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

4. Events<br />

5. Funshopping<br />

6. Sidewalk cafés<br />

6<br />

4<br />

6<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

Schouwburgplein<br />

Grote Markt<br />

Oude Markt<br />

Markt<br />

Beurstraverse<br />

Statenplein<br />

Van Heekplein<br />

Loeffplein<br />

7092<br />

Figure 7.5 Six-dimensional profiles of all research objects as secured (upper half ) or themed<br />

(lower half ) <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> (Loeffplein including the Arena is left out)<br />

was completed without involvement of the private sector. The Markt and Van Heekplein both<br />

function as market place, but differ with respect to the actors involved in the redevelopment;<br />

while the Markt will be redesigned without any private-sector involvement, the Van Heekplein<br />

was upgraded with an abundance of private actors (see Table 5.3). To find out to what extent the<br />

differences and similarities in terms of fear versus fantasy can be linked to variations in terms<br />

of <strong>public</strong> versus PPP developments, the diagrams of the eight research objects are combined<br />

in Figure 7.5. The projects are grouped on the basis of their main function (non-retail or retail<br />

squares) and actors involved in the redesign process (only <strong>public</strong> sector or PPP). Because these<br />

groups completely overlap, only the latter is indicated in the heading of the diagrams.<br />

The most striking outcome of Figure 7.5 is that <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>s redesigned by both the <strong>public</strong><br />

and the private sector (PPP squares) without exception show high ratings on the dimension<br />

‘funshopping’. This might not be surprising, because the inventory of redeveloped city squares<br />

already revealed that the involvement of the private sector is almost entirely restricted to<br />

retail squares (Section 5.2.3). However, not every retail square necessarily has high ratings on<br />

funshopping. There are neighbourhood squares outside the city centre that have a retail function,<br />

which Klaassen (1994) defines as facility squares (Section 2.6). These squares often consist of<br />

parking <strong>space</strong> surrounded by shops with a dominant ‘run’ nature such as supermarkets and<br />

convenience stores with low-order assortments. However, within city centres – at least in<br />

our case-study cities – retail squares are prime locations for funshopping. Because of this<br />

homogeneous outcome, it is safe to conclude that retail is an important, if not compulsory<br />

precondition for the private sector to become involved in the redevelopment of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. This<br />

preference to participate in retail redevelopment projects is also observed in international real<br />

estate literature. Adair et al. (2003), for example, found that retail property performs extremely<br />

well within regeneration areas, which appear to be particularly suited to shopping centres and<br />

retail warehousing investments. Section 8.2.2 describes the role and objectives of the private<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!