25.09.2015 Views

Changing public space

Changing public space

Changing public space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

concepts have been specified in six quantifiable and observable dimensions: three related to fear/<br />

secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> and three to fantasy/themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. Each dimension is assigned an<br />

ordinal value according to three levels of intensity: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). With<br />

regard to the dimensions of surveillance and events, a low intensity actually implies an absence<br />

of recording devices and no organised events, respectively. This might be confusing, as the term<br />

‘low’ indicates an occurrence (of, in this case, cameras or events), albeit on a small scale. However,<br />

when a <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> rates low on CCTV, this does not automatically imply that surveillance is<br />

not important at all. The <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> might be supervised in another way, for example by police<br />

patrols, which would fall under the dimension of regulation. Similarly, a low rating on events<br />

does not necessarily mean no spontaneous events occur at all, only that there are no organised<br />

events. The dimensions do not express value judgements; a low rating does not imply that a<br />

square is malfunctioning. For example, it is not a problem if a square rates low on surveillance as<br />

long as the users feel safe.<br />

The degree to which the dimensions listed in Table 5.4 occur in <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> can be assessed<br />

by observations, literature research, and analysis of policy documents. The ensuing intensities can<br />

be depicted in six-dimensional diagrams. The outer ring of the diagram indicates the extreme<br />

rating for each dimension on a scale of one to three (low, medium, and high). The fuller the<br />

coverage in the upper half of the circle (dimensions 1 to 3), the more that particular place is<br />

Table 5.4 Operationalisation of fear and fantasy in secured and themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

Dimension Intensity Description<br />

Secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

1. Surveillance L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

2. Restraints on loitering L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

3. Regulation L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

Themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

4. Events L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

5. Funshopping L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

6. Sidewalk cafés L.<br />

M.<br />

H.<br />

No CCTV<br />

CCTV is installed, images are recorded<br />

CCTV is installed, images are watched live<br />

Benches are present, <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> cannot be fenced off<br />

No benches available, <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> cannot be fenced off<br />

Public <strong>space</strong> can be fenced off, regardless of presence of benches<br />

Regular local ordinance, enforced by local police<br />

Regular local ordinance, enforced by local police and private security<br />

Additional regulation, enforced by local police and private security<br />

No organised events<br />

Events are organised, no permanent facilities available<br />

Events are organised, permanent facilities available<br />

No/limited number of shops (50 per cent of total surrounding<br />

property)<br />

Majority of shops of ‘fun’ nature* (>50 per cent of total surrounding<br />

property)<br />

No/limited number of sidewalk cafés present (< 10 per cent of total<br />

surface)<br />

Present, small coverage of terraces (10-50 per cent of total surface)<br />

Present, large coverage of terraces (>50 per cent of total surface)<br />

*<br />

Runshops include convenience stores selling groceries or appliances. Funshops are stores with discretionary shopping goods<br />

such as clothing and jewellery (based on Gorter et al., 2003).<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!