Changing public space
Changing public space
Changing public space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
concepts have been specified in six quantifiable and observable dimensions: three related to fear/<br />
secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> and three to fantasy/themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. Each dimension is assigned an<br />
ordinal value according to three levels of intensity: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). With<br />
regard to the dimensions of surveillance and events, a low intensity actually implies an absence<br />
of recording devices and no organised events, respectively. This might be confusing, as the term<br />
‘low’ indicates an occurrence (of, in this case, cameras or events), albeit on a small scale. However,<br />
when a <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> rates low on CCTV, this does not automatically imply that surveillance is<br />
not important at all. The <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> might be supervised in another way, for example by police<br />
patrols, which would fall under the dimension of regulation. Similarly, a low rating on events<br />
does not necessarily mean no spontaneous events occur at all, only that there are no organised<br />
events. The dimensions do not express value judgements; a low rating does not imply that a<br />
square is malfunctioning. For example, it is not a problem if a square rates low on surveillance as<br />
long as the users feel safe.<br />
The degree to which the dimensions listed in Table 5.4 occur in <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> can be assessed<br />
by observations, literature research, and analysis of policy documents. The ensuing intensities can<br />
be depicted in six-dimensional diagrams. The outer ring of the diagram indicates the extreme<br />
rating for each dimension on a scale of one to three (low, medium, and high). The fuller the<br />
coverage in the upper half of the circle (dimensions 1 to 3), the more that particular place is<br />
Table 5.4 Operationalisation of fear and fantasy in secured and themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
Dimension Intensity Description<br />
Secured <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
1. Surveillance L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
2. Restraints on loitering L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
3. Regulation L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
Themed <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
4. Events L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
5. Funshopping L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
6. Sidewalk cafés L.<br />
M.<br />
H.<br />
No CCTV<br />
CCTV is installed, images are recorded<br />
CCTV is installed, images are watched live<br />
Benches are present, <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> cannot be fenced off<br />
No benches available, <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> cannot be fenced off<br />
Public <strong>space</strong> can be fenced off, regardless of presence of benches<br />
Regular local ordinance, enforced by local police<br />
Regular local ordinance, enforced by local police and private security<br />
Additional regulation, enforced by local police and private security<br />
No organised events<br />
Events are organised, no permanent facilities available<br />
Events are organised, permanent facilities available<br />
No/limited number of shops (50 per cent of total surrounding<br />
property)<br />
Majority of shops of ‘fun’ nature* (>50 per cent of total surrounding<br />
property)<br />
No/limited number of sidewalk cafés present (< 10 per cent of total<br />
surface)<br />
Present, small coverage of terraces (10-50 per cent of total surface)<br />
Present, large coverage of terraces (>50 per cent of total surface)<br />
*<br />
Runshops include convenience stores selling groceries or appliances. Funshops are stores with discretionary shopping goods<br />
such as clothing and jewellery (based on Gorter et al., 2003).<br />
95