25.09.2015 Views

Changing public space

Changing public space

Changing public space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and investors hardly contribute to directing the redevelopment process and maintaining the<br />

<strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> after it has been redeveloped. The Beurstraverse is the exception.<br />

8.2.3 Role of the stakeholders<br />

The potential role of other stakeholders has been described in Section 4.3.3, which focused<br />

on retailers, local residents, and preservation groups. The motive of retailers to be involved in<br />

redevelopment stems from the expected increase in sales after the upgrading. However, they<br />

might also fear increased competition and a loss of income during the reconstruction period.<br />

The retailers have not been explicitily interviewed as a group of actors in the research, because<br />

they are mainly regarded as stakeholders rather than active actors. Nevertheless, some remarks<br />

can be made on their role and objectives regarding the redevelopment of the PPP squares. The<br />

examples of the Beurstraverse and Statenplein show that retailers, such as the owners of the<br />

retail conglomerate C&A and department store V&D, can sometimes initiate the redevelopment<br />

process rather than the local government or a developer (Table 8.4).<br />

In Rotterdam, the intended demolition and rebuilding of the C&A store generated the idea<br />

to also redevelop the store’s immediate surrounding, which eventually led to the development<br />

of the Beurstraverse as sunken underpass. In case of the Statenplein, the owner of V&D<br />

(VendexKBB) and developer Multi jointly induced a breakthrough in the seemingly endless<br />

discussion about the square’s redevelopment. In both projects, the redevelopment of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

was closely linked to the upgrading of the department stores. However, while the owners of<br />

C&A desired to expand (in the 1980s), the owners of the V&D were interested in reducing the<br />

floor <strong>space</strong> of their department store (in the 1990s). This difference is related to the fact that not<br />

only the V&D, but department stores in general are going through difficult times in the last<br />

decade (see text box). They have to deal with increasing competition of other shops. The sales<br />

of large products such as furniture have declined due to the competition of so-called ‘furniture<br />

Table 8.4 Role of the stakeholders in the redevelopment of the PPP squares<br />

Initiative<br />

Beurstraverse Statenplein Van Heekplein Loeffplein<br />

C&A’s plans to<br />

upgrade its store<br />

triggered Multi’s<br />

proposal to also<br />

redevelop its<br />

surroudings<br />

VendexKBB (and<br />

Multi) came with<br />

final redevelopment<br />

plan<br />

Design - - VendexKBB was<br />

highly involved<br />

in brainstorm<br />

concerning design<br />

of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

- Association of local<br />

entrepreneurs (Hartje<br />

’s-Hertogenbosch)<br />

triggered decisionmaking<br />

process<br />

Hartje ’s-Hertogenbosch<br />

was involved in the<br />

selection process of the<br />

designers<br />

Process - - - Hartje ’s-Hertogenbosch<br />

was responsible to settle<br />

the objections to the<br />

redevelopment plan<br />

Finance - - - -<br />

Maintenance - - - -<br />

Source: Interviews (2006)<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!