Changing public space

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dessouroux, C. (2003), La diversité des processus de privatisation de l’espace public dans les villes européennes. Belgeo 3(1), pp. 21-46. Dines, N. & V. Cattell (2006), Public spaces, social relations and well-being in East London. London: The Policy Press. DN Urbland (2005), Ruim baan voor de pleinen: Pleinenvisie Deventer. Deventer: Stichting Deventer Binnenstads Management. Dona, H. (2004), De visie achter de ontwikkeling van het stationsgebied. In: I. Bruil, F. Hobma, G. Peek & G. Wigmans, eds., Integrale gebiedsontwikkeling: Het stationsgebied ‘s-Hertogenbosch. Amsterdam: SUN. Dordregter, P. (2003), Pleinen: Een inleiding. In: K. Veenendaal, ed., Pleinenboek. Utrecht: Hogeschool voor de Kunsten. Dowding, K. (2001), Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), pp. 7-19. dS+V (Dienst Stedenbouw en Volkshuisvesting), Bestuursdienst Rotterdam, Gemeente Werken Rotterdam, Ontwikkelingsbedrijf Rotterdam (1993), Binnenstad Rotterdam: Beleidskader voor verdere verdichting en beheer 1993-2000. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. dS+V (1994), An inner city with outstanding opportunities. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Eisinger, P. (2000), The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review, 35(3), pp. 316-333. Ellin, N. (2001), Thresholds of fear: Embracing the urban shadow. Urban Studies, 38(5-6), pp. 869-883. Engel, B. (2006), Public space in the blue cities of Russia. Progress in Planning, 66(3), pp. 14-239. Engels, P. (2006), Omgevingsarchitectuurprijs 2006: Succesvolle inrichtingen zonder overdreven vormwil. Stadswerk, 14, p. 22. Enschede-stad (2006), H.J. van Heekplein. Retrieved on 28-03-2006 from www.enschede-stad.nl/~Reportage/ Heekplein/index.htm Fainstein, S.S. (2001), The city builders: Property, politics, and planning in London and New York, 1980-2000. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press. Flight, S. & P. Hulshof (2006), Cameratoezicht moet volwassen worden. Rooilijn, 39(6), pp. 276-281. Florida, R. (2002), The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books. Flusty, S. (1997), Building paranoia. In: N. Ellin, ed., Architecture of fear. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004), Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In: C. Seale, G. Gaobo, J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman, eds., Qualitative research practice. London: Sage. Ford, L.R. (2000), The spaces between buildings. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press. French, J.S. (1983), Urban space: A brief history of the city square. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt. Fyfe, N.R. & J. Bannister (1998), The eyes upon the street: Closed-circuit television surveillance and the city. In: N.R. Fyfe, ed., Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space. London: Routledge. Gadet, J. (1999), Publieke ruimte, parochiale plekken en passantenopenbaarheid: Jonge alleenwonende Amsterdammers over stedelijkheid. Amsterdam: Bosch & Bosch. Gaventa, S. (2006), New public spaces. London: Mitchell Beazley. Gehl, J. & L. Gemzoe (1996), Public spaces – public life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press. Gemeente Dordrecht (1996), Ondernemingsplan binnenstad: Ruimte voor kwaliteit. Dordrecht: Gemeente Dordrecht. Gemeente Dordrecht (1997), Masterplan Statenplein e.o. Dordrecht: Gemeente Dordrecht in co-operation with Multi Vastgoed, T+T Design and Buys & Van Der Vliet. Gemeente Enschede (1996), Binnenstadsboek. Enschede: Gemeente Enschede. 220
Gemeente Enschede (1999), H.J. van Heekplein: Het stedenbouwkundig ontwerp. Enschede: Gemeente Enschede/West 8 Landscape Architects. Gemeente Enschede (2003), Nieuwsbrief Stedelijk Hart Enschede, 1(1), pp. 1-4. Gemeente Enschede (2004), H.J. van Heekplein: Een nieuw plein op een bekende plek. Enschede: StadEnschede. Gemeente Enschede , AM Vastgoed & Foruminvest BV/Prowinko Groep (2004), Informatie ten behoeve van NEPROM-prijs voor locatieontwikkeling 2004. Gouda: NEPROM Gemeente Enschede (2006), Zicht op Enschede: Monitor stedelijke ontwikkeling 2005. Enschede: Gemeente Enschede. Gemeente Rotterdam (1987), Nieuw Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Adviescommissie Sociaal-Economische Vernieuwing. Gemeente Rotterdam (1993), Overeenkomst met Nationale Nederlanden en Multi Development Corporation voor het Beurspleinproject en krediet voor verwerving en bouwrijp maken. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente Rotterdam (2006), Meerjaren investeringsprogramma buitenruimte 2006-2020. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente Rotterdam (2007a), Stadsvisie Rotterdam: Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingsstrategie 2030. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente Rotterdam (200bc), Verbonden stad: Visie openbare ruimte binnenstad Rotterdam – concept september 2007. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente Rotterdam (200cb), Veiligheidsindex 2007: Meting van de veiligheid in Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (1993), ‘De Binnenstad Buiten’: Beleidsplan voor de openbare ruimte in de binnenstad van ’s-Hertogenbosch.’s-Hertogenboch: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch & Bureau B+B. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (2002), Nieuwsbrief herinrichting Markt. ’s-Hertogenbosch: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (2004), Binnenstadsmonitor 2004. ’s-Hertogenboch: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (2005), Raadsvoorstel ontwerpuitgangspunten herinrichting Markt/Pensmarkt. ’s-Hertogenbosch: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (2006), Herinrichting Markt + Pensmarkt. ’s-Hertogenbosch: Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch. Gemeente ’s-Hertogenbosch (2007), Opknappen Markt en Pensmarkt. Retrieved on 09-11-2007 from www. denbosch.nl/content.cfm?contentid=676DCE1A-8021-0F65-03F3E2FD90A15024 Girouard, M. (1985), Cities and people: A social and architectural history. New Haven: Yale University Press. Glassner, B. (1999), The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books. Goheen, P.C. (1998), Public space and the geography of the modern city. Progress in Human Geography, 22(4), pp. 479-496. Goodin, R.E., B. Headey, R. Muffels & H.J. Dirven (1999), The real worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goossens, J., A. Guinée & W. Oosterhoff (1995), Buitenruimte: Ontwerp, aanleg en beheer van de openbare ruimte in Rotterdam. Rotterdam: 010. Gorter, C., P. Nijkamp & P. Klamer (2003), The attraction force of out-of-town shopping malls: A case study of run-fun shopping in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(2), pp. 219-229. Gospodini, A. (2006), Portraying, classifying and understanding the emerging landscapes in the post-industrial city. Cities, 23(5), pp. 311-330. Graham, S. & S. Marvin (2001) Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Oxon: Blackwell. Gregory, D. & J. Urry (1985), Social relations and spatial structures. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 221
Page 1 and 2:
Changing public space The recent re
Page 3 and 4:
Changing public space
Page 5 and 6:
Netherlands Geographical Studies 37
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Figures 9 Tables 11 Voorwo
Page 9 and 10:
7 Fear and fantasy in the cases 147
Page 11 and 12:
Figures 1.1 Outline of the thesis 2
Page 13 and 14:
Tables 2.1 Development of European
Page 15 and 16:
Voorwoord Al reizend ervaart men he
Page 17 and 18:
1 Changing role of public space in
Page 19 and 20:
23 per cent of the geographical pub
Page 21 and 22:
Mentzel (1993: 104):* the place whe
Page 23 and 24:
home country but also evaluate publ
Page 25 and 26:
1. How have the design and manageme
Page 27 and 28:
and agency as complementary forces
Page 29 and 30:
of public space, it could also make
Page 31 and 32:
2 Development and typology of Dutch
Page 33 and 34:
periods, the table illustrates the
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.1 The Vismarkt (fish marke
Page 37 and 38:
1985 on behest of the communist lea
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2.2 Neude in Utrecht in 1989
Page 41 and 42:
(Prak, 2002; Meyer et al., 2006). B
Page 43 and 44:
ecause its situation has altered th
Page 45 and 46:
connection can also be less clear-c
Page 47 and 48:
can also explain why certain square
Page 49 and 50:
3 Current trends in the design and
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 3.1 Sign of CCTV in Barcelon
Page 53 and 54:
easy access (Lofland, 1998). This c
Page 55 and 56:
how entertainment has gone through
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 3.2 The Beestenmarkt in Delf
Page 59 and 60:
Dynamics in production structures
Page 61 and 62:
surveillance cameras, their operato
Page 63 and 64:
at redeveloped derelict sites that
Page 65 and 66:
4 Private-sector involvement in the
Page 67 and 68:
urban policy in the 1980s after an
Page 69 and 70:
(1989) defines as the transformatio
Page 71 and 72:
3. A shift from public sector to pr
Page 73 and 74:
through a blend of architectural de
Page 75 and 76:
4.3.1 Role and objectives of local
Page 77 and 78:
uildings and to emphasise that they
Page 79 and 80:
increase in the number of rules or
Page 81 and 82:
for the dispossessed, which Mitchel
Page 83 and 84:
process (i.e., longer duration, mor
Page 85 and 86:
5 Research design and methodology I
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.1 Cultural square: Museump
Page 89 and 90:
(Slager, 2007). There are also hybr
Page 91 and 92:
5.2.2 Inventory of Dutch city squar
Page 93 and 94:
Table 5.3 Research objects in the n
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix C consists of an interview
Page 97 and 98:
concepts have been specified in six
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5.7 Permanent stage on the G
Page 101 and 102:
6 Urban policy and spatial structur
Page 103 and 104:
document to stimulate the diversifi
Page 105 and 106:
six museums in the area, which were
Page 107 and 108:
emphasises the need for well-connec
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 6.2 Schouwburgplein Central
Page 111 and 112:
Table 6.3 Timeline of developments
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 6.4 Beurstraverse Bijenkorf
Page 115 and 116:
Table 6.4 Policies and changes in p
Page 117 and 118:
The Spuiboulevard was the first pro
Page 119 and 120:
Table 6.5 Timeline of developments
Page 121 and 122:
is unclear when the real redevelopm
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 6.9 Statenplein Scheffersple
Page 125 and 126:
success to a strong project leader,
Page 127 and 128:
6.4.1 Policy and structure in Ensch
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 6.12 Oude Markt 7021 Stadsgr
Page 131 and 132:
the market. However, the market ass
Page 133 and 134:
etail stores. The Van Heekplein thu
Page 135 and 136:
After all actors were involved and
Page 137 and 138:
government realised it needed to pr
Page 139 and 140:
compared to 36 per cent in 2000. Th
Page 141 and 142:
this therefore also includes the Pe
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 6.19 Loeffplein Bloemenkamp
Page 145 and 146:
Loeffplein and the Stoa (Figure 6.1
Page 147 and 148:
problems). In addition, it appointe
Page 149 and 150:
7 Fear and fantasy in the cases 7.1
Page 151 and 152:
cafés. The members of the consorti
Page 153 and 154:
esidential square located outside t
Page 155 and 156:
also perceive it that way; they eva
Page 157 and 158:
comprised of many stores with a ‘
Page 159 and 160:
actors involved in the cases in mor
Page 161 and 162:
confirms the work of several author
Page 163 and 164:
8 Private-sector involvement in the
Page 165 and 166:
8.2.1 Role and objectives of the lo
Page 167 and 168:
Discussions during the focus group
Page 169 and 170:
and investors hardly contribute to
Page 171 and 172: the architects responsible for the
Page 173 and 174: 2) a decrease in the free access of
Page 175 and 176: There is also a compulsive pressure
Page 177 and 178: they argued that property owners ar
Page 179 and 180: They were all refuted until V&D and
Page 181 and 182: In addition to a longer duration, p
Page 183 and 184: In a similar vein, one informant em
Page 185 and 186: 9 Conclusions, reflections, and imp
Page 187 and 188: were laid out in the 1950s as parts
Page 189 and 190: ‘supply side’. This includes th
Page 191 and 192: Van Heekplein (i.e., Foruminvest, H
Page 193 and 194: edevelopment of the PPP squares was
Page 195 and 196: more restricted due to private-sect
Page 197 and 198: Glossary Chief Government Architect
Page 199 and 200: Appendix A Interviews and focus gro
Page 201 and 202: Table A.5 Case-study interviews on
Page 203 and 204: (1) (2) (3) City a Population b Nam
Page 205 and 206: 2. Object: changes in the design an
Page 207 and 208: Capacities: Role of investor Respon
Page 209 and 210: Table E.2 Main Dutch investors invo
Page 211 and 212: Samenvatting Veranderende openbare
Page 213 and 214: Beurstraverse. Het Van Heekplein in
Page 215 and 216: in hun eigendom, maar ook in de rui
Page 217 and 218: uimte leiden. Tenslotte kunnen de b
Page 219 and 220: References Aarts, M., ed. (1995), E
Page 221: Burgers, J. (2003), De historische
Page 225 and 226: Ibelings, H. (2004), Geprivatiseerd
Page 227 and 228: Mitchell, D. (2001), Postmodern geo
Page 229 and 230: Rishbeth, C. & N. Finney (2006), No
Page 231 and 232: Van de Wiel, J. (1996), De winkelfu
Page 233 and 234: Curriculum vitae Rianne van Melik w
Page 235 and 236: NEDERLANDSE GEOGRAFISCHE STUDIES /
show all

Changing public space

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?