Changing public space

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Staeheli, L.A. & D. Mitchell (2006), USA’s Destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls. Urban Studies, 43(5/6), pp. 977-992. Staeheli, L.A. & D. Mitchell (2007), Locating the public in research and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), pp. 792-811. Staeheli, L.A. & D. Mitchell (2008), The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. New York: Routledge. Stedelijk Interieur (2007), Stedelijk Interieur waardering. De 52 beste openbare ruimtes van Nederland. Stedelijk Interieur, April 2007, pp.16-38. Stevens, Q. (2007), The ludic city: Exploring the potential of public spaces. London: Routledge. Stoker, G. (1995), Regime theory and urban politics. In: D. Judge, G. Stoker & H. Wolman, eds., Theories of urban politics. London: Sage. Stone, C. (1993), Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), pp. 1-28. Swanborn, P. (1996), Case-study’s: Wat, wanneer en hoe? Amsterdam: Boom. Symes, S. & M. Steel (2003), Lessons from America: The role of business improvement districts as an agent of urban regeneration. Town Planning Review, 74(3), pp. 301-313. Szelenyi, I. (1996), Cities under socialism and after. In: G. Andrusz, M. Harloe & I. Szelenyi, eds., Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Oxford: Blackwell. Taipale, K. (2006), From Piazza Navona to Google or, from local public space to global public sphere. Paper presented at the conference Public Spheres and their boundaries, Tampere (Finland) 25-27 May 2006. Tan, E. (2006), Downtown Disney. Nova Terra, 6(4), pp. 12-16. Taşan-Kok, T. (2004), Budapest, Istanbul, and Warsaw: Institutional and spatial change. Delft: Eburon. Teisman, G.R. (1995), Complexe besluitvorming: Een pluricentrisch perspektief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen. The Hague: VUGA. Ter Beek, H.M. & M. Mosselman (2006), Business Improvement Districts in Nederland: Draagvlak, vormgeving en voorwaarden voor toepassing. Amsterdam: Regioplan. Terhorst, P. & J. Van de Ven (1999), ‘Reizende koopkracht’ bedreigt verzorgingshiërarchie: De binnenstad wordt themapark. Geografie, 8(2), pp. 16-19. Tiesdell, S. & T. Oc (1998), Beyond ‘fortress’ and ‘panoptic’ cities: Towards a safer urban public realm. Environment and Planning B, 25(5), pp. 639-655. Toon, I. (2000), Finding a place in the street: CCTV surveillance and young people’s use of urban public space. In: D. Bell & A. Haddour, eds., City Visions. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Urry, J. (2001), The sociology of space and place. In: J.R. Blau, ed., The Blackwell companion to sociology. Oxford: Blackwell. Valentine, G. (2004), Public space and the culture of childhood. Aldershot: Ashgate. Van Aalst, I. (1997), Cultuur in de stad: Over de rol van culturele voorzieningen in de ontwikkeling van stadscentra. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel. Van Aalst, I. & I. Boogaarts (2002), From museum to mass entertainment: The evolution of the role of museums in cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), pp. 195-209. Van Aalst, I. & E. Ennen (2002), Openbare ruimten, tussen activiteit en attractiviteit: Over de functie van openbare ruimten als identiteitsbepalende stedelijke landschappen. Utrecht: Nethur. Van Aalst, I. & G. Bergenhenegouwen (2003), Openbare ruimte op een hellend vlak. Rooilijn, 36(8), pp. 397-402. Van Assema, P., I. Mesters & G. Kok (1992), Het focusgroep-interview: Een stappenplan. Tijdschrift voor sociale gezondheidszorg, 70(7), pp. 431-437. 228
Van de Wiel, J. (1996), De winkelfunctie van de binnenstad: Ontwikkeling sinds de Tweede Wereldoorlog. In: F. Boekema, J. Buursink & J. Van de Wiel, eds., Het behoud van de binnenstad als winkelhart. Assen: Van Gorcum. Van den Berg, L., P. Pol, G. Mingardo & C. Speller (2006), The safe city: Safety and urban development in European cities. Aldershot: Ashgate. Van der Lans, J. (2004), De straat als huiskamer. Vrij Nederland, 65(16), pp. 47-49. Van der Plas, G., ed. (1991), De openbare ruimte van de stad. Amsterdam: Genootschap Amstelodamum. Van der Wouden, R., ed. (1999a), De stad op straat: De openbare ruimte in perspectief. The Hague: Social en Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands. Van der Wouden, R. (1999b), De transformatie van de openbare ruimte. Rooilijn, 32(10), pp. 492-498. Van der Wouden, R. (2002), Meervoudig ruimtegebruik als culturele opgave. Nova Terra, 2(2), pp. 35-39. Van der Wusten, H. (2005), De Lissabonstrategie: Loopt de Europese kenniseconomie in op die van de VS? Geografie, 14(4), pp. 34-35. Van Dijk, H. (2001), Regisseren aan de stad. Blad van Nederlandse Architecten, October 2001, pp. 10-13. Van Leeuwen, A. (2006), Bloeiende binnensteden. Elsevier, 62, pp. 90-97. Van Melik, R., J. Van Weesep & I. Van Aalst (2005), Spiegels van de samenleving: Pleinen door de eeuwen heen. In: Sprekende pleinen. Ontmoetingen tussen mensen, wanden en een vloer. Leusden: BMC. Van Melik, R. & J. Van Weesep (2006), Terrorismebestrijding of criminaliteitspreventie? Agora, 22(1), pp. 20-23. Van Melik, R., I. Van Aalst & J. Van Weesep (2007), Fear and fantasy in the public domain: The development of secured and themed urban space. Journal of Urban Design, 12(1), pp. 25-42. Van Rhee, M., D. Linders & C. Ergun (2005), Binnenstadsmonitor 2005. Rotterdam: Centrum voor Onderzoek en Statistiek (COS). Veenendaal, K., ed. (2003), Pleinenboek. Utrecht: Hogeschool voor de Kunsten Utrecht. Vermeijden, B. (2001), Dutch urban renewal: Transformation of the policy discourse 1960-2000. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(2), pp. 203-232. Volk, R. (1998), The invention of the urban open space. In: J.M. Schrijnen, R. Volk, H. Buijs & G. Ploeg, eds., Skyhigh living. Rotterdam: City Informatiecentrum. VROM. (2001), Ruimte maken, ruimte delen: Vijfde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening 2000-2020. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM). VROM (2004), Nota ruimte: Ruimte voor ontwikkeling. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM). VROM (2005), Ruimte voor ons allemaal. Participeren in beheer van de openbare ruimte. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM). Wagenaar, M. (1999), Pleinen, parken en boulevards: Vorm en vulling van het publieke domein. In: R. Van der Wouden, ed., De stad op straat: De openbare ruimte in perspectief. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office. Walzer, M. (1986), Pleasures and costs of urbanity. Dissent, 33(4), pp. 470-475. Wansborough, M. & A. Mageean (2000), The role of urban design in cultural regeneration. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2), pp. 181-198. Webb, M. (1990), The city square: A historical evolution. London: Thames and Hudson. Webster, C. (2007), Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review, 78(1), pp. 81-101. Webster, C. & L.W. Lai (2003), Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. West 8 (1998), Programma van eisen buitenruimte H.J. van Heekplein. Rotterdam: West8 Landscape Architects. Whyte, W.H. (1980), The social life of small urban spaces. Washington: Conservation Foundation. 229
Page 1 and 2:
Changing public space The recent re
Page 3 and 4:
Changing public space
Page 5 and 6:
Netherlands Geographical Studies 37
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Figures 9 Tables 11 Voorwo
Page 9 and 10:
7 Fear and fantasy in the cases 147
Page 11 and 12:
Figures 1.1 Outline of the thesis 2
Page 13 and 14:
Tables 2.1 Development of European
Page 15 and 16:
Voorwoord Al reizend ervaart men he
Page 17 and 18:
1 Changing role of public space in
Page 19 and 20:
23 per cent of the geographical pub
Page 21 and 22:
Mentzel (1993: 104):* the place whe
Page 23 and 24:
home country but also evaluate publ
Page 25 and 26:
1. How have the design and manageme
Page 27 and 28:
and agency as complementary forces
Page 29 and 30:
of public space, it could also make
Page 31 and 32:
2 Development and typology of Dutch
Page 33 and 34:
periods, the table illustrates the
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2.1 The Vismarkt (fish marke
Page 37 and 38:
1985 on behest of the communist lea
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2.2 Neude in Utrecht in 1989
Page 41 and 42:
(Prak, 2002; Meyer et al., 2006). B
Page 43 and 44:
ecause its situation has altered th
Page 45 and 46:
connection can also be less clear-c
Page 47 and 48:
can also explain why certain square
Page 49 and 50:
3 Current trends in the design and
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 3.1 Sign of CCTV in Barcelon
Page 53 and 54:
easy access (Lofland, 1998). This c
Page 55 and 56:
how entertainment has gone through
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 3.2 The Beestenmarkt in Delf
Page 59 and 60:
Dynamics in production structures
Page 61 and 62:
surveillance cameras, their operato
Page 63 and 64:
at redeveloped derelict sites that
Page 65 and 66:
4 Private-sector involvement in the
Page 67 and 68:
urban policy in the 1980s after an
Page 69 and 70:
(1989) defines as the transformatio
Page 71 and 72:
3. A shift from public sector to pr
Page 73 and 74:
through a blend of architectural de
Page 75 and 76:
4.3.1 Role and objectives of local
Page 77 and 78:
uildings and to emphasise that they
Page 79 and 80:
increase in the number of rules or
Page 81 and 82:
for the dispossessed, which Mitchel
Page 83 and 84:
process (i.e., longer duration, mor
Page 85 and 86:
5 Research design and methodology I
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.1 Cultural square: Museump
Page 89 and 90:
(Slager, 2007). There are also hybr
Page 91 and 92:
5.2.2 Inventory of Dutch city squar
Page 93 and 94:
Table 5.3 Research objects in the n
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix C consists of an interview
Page 97 and 98:
concepts have been specified in six
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5.7 Permanent stage on the G
Page 101 and 102:
6 Urban policy and spatial structur
Page 103 and 104:
document to stimulate the diversifi
Page 105 and 106:
six museums in the area, which were
Page 107 and 108:
emphasises the need for well-connec
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 6.2 Schouwburgplein Central
Page 111 and 112:
Table 6.3 Timeline of developments
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 6.4 Beurstraverse Bijenkorf
Page 115 and 116:
Table 6.4 Policies and changes in p
Page 117 and 118:
The Spuiboulevard was the first pro
Page 119 and 120:
Table 6.5 Timeline of developments
Page 121 and 122:
is unclear when the real redevelopm
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 6.9 Statenplein Scheffersple
Page 125 and 126:
success to a strong project leader,
Page 127 and 128:
6.4.1 Policy and structure in Ensch
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 6.12 Oude Markt 7021 Stadsgr
Page 131 and 132:
the market. However, the market ass
Page 133 and 134:
etail stores. The Van Heekplein thu
Page 135 and 136:
After all actors were involved and
Page 137 and 138:
government realised it needed to pr
Page 139 and 140:
compared to 36 per cent in 2000. Th
Page 141 and 142:
this therefore also includes the Pe
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 6.19 Loeffplein Bloemenkamp
Page 145 and 146:
Loeffplein and the Stoa (Figure 6.1
Page 147 and 148:
problems). In addition, it appointe
Page 149 and 150:
7 Fear and fantasy in the cases 7.1
Page 151 and 152:
cafés. The members of the consorti
Page 153 and 154:
esidential square located outside t
Page 155 and 156:
also perceive it that way; they eva
Page 157 and 158:
comprised of many stores with a ‘
Page 159 and 160:
actors involved in the cases in mor
Page 161 and 162:
confirms the work of several author
Page 163 and 164:
8 Private-sector involvement in the
Page 165 and 166:
8.2.1 Role and objectives of the lo
Page 167 and 168:
Discussions during the focus group
Page 169 and 170:
and investors hardly contribute to
Page 171 and 172:
the architects responsible for the
Page 173 and 174:
2) a decrease in the free access of
Page 175 and 176:
There is also a compulsive pressure
Page 177 and 178:
they argued that property owners ar
Page 179 and 180: They were all refuted until V&D and
Page 181 and 182: In addition to a longer duration, p
Page 183 and 184: In a similar vein, one informant em
Page 185 and 186: 9 Conclusions, reflections, and imp
Page 187 and 188: were laid out in the 1950s as parts
Page 189 and 190: ‘supply side’. This includes th
Page 191 and 192: Van Heekplein (i.e., Foruminvest, H
Page 193 and 194: edevelopment of the PPP squares was
Page 195 and 196: more restricted due to private-sect
Page 197 and 198: Glossary Chief Government Architect
Page 199 and 200: Appendix A Interviews and focus gro
Page 201 and 202: Table A.5 Case-study interviews on
Page 203 and 204: (1) (2) (3) City a Population b Nam
Page 205 and 206: 2. Object: changes in the design an
Page 207 and 208: Capacities: Role of investor Respon
Page 209 and 210: Table E.2 Main Dutch investors invo
Page 211 and 212: Samenvatting Veranderende openbare
Page 213 and 214: Beurstraverse. Het Van Heekplein in
Page 215 and 216: in hun eigendom, maar ook in de rui
Page 217 and 218: uimte leiden. Tenslotte kunnen de b
Page 219 and 220: References Aarts, M., ed. (1995), E
Page 221 and 222: Burgers, J. (2003), De historische
Page 223 and 224: Gemeente Enschede (1999), H.J. van
Page 225 and 226: Ibelings, H. (2004), Geprivatiseerd
Page 227 and 228: Mitchell, D. (2001), Postmodern geo
Page 229: Rishbeth, C. & N. Finney (2006), No
Page 233 and 234: Curriculum vitae Rianne van Melik w
Page 235 and 236: NEDERLANDSE GEOGRAFISCHE STUDIES /
show all

Changing public space

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?