Changing public space
Changing public space
Changing public space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
This suggests that the private sector is mainly interested in participating in the redevelopment<br />
of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> when the total project involves new (preferably retail) constructions rather than<br />
the mere beautification of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. Therefore, it is not surprising that the four PPP squares<br />
all show an increase of retail in the surrounding property (i.e., the construction of shops in the<br />
Beurstraverse, the Nieuwe Blok at the Statenplein, the Arena and Stoa at the Loeffplein, and the<br />
Bijenkorf and upgrading of the V&D and Klanderij at the Van Heekplein). Some informants<br />
stressed that there are examples where the private sector is willing to invest in non-retail squares,<br />
but this mainly concerns housing associations involved in the upgrading of residential squares<br />
located outside the city centre rather than, for example, cultural squares:<br />
That’s logical [that the private sector is not involved in cultural squares], because it has<br />
no control over what will happen in those ‘temples of culture’ and thus the return is<br />
unpredictable. However, there are examples of places you can redevelop with support<br />
of associations that own the surrounding property. In that case, control and financial<br />
advantages are more predictable. For example the Mercatorplein in Amsterdam, where<br />
associations could obtain capital from the bank to co-finance the design of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
based on the expected increase in value of the association’s property. (Designer II)<br />
However, co-financing <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> is often limited to large investors. Individual shop-owners are<br />
usually not very eager to participate in urban redevelopment, because they feel that they would<br />
be performing a task of the local government. Table 8.3 shows the role of the private sector in the<br />
redevelopment of the PPP squares. The private actors seem particularly involved in the finance<br />
and design of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>, which is elaborated in Section 8.3.1 and 8.3.3. In contrast, developers<br />
Table 8.3 Role of the private sector in the redevelopment of the PPP squares<br />
Initiative<br />
Design<br />
Beurstraverse Statenplein Van Heekplein Loeffplein<br />
Developer Multi took<br />
initiative to expand<br />
C&A’s upgrading<br />
plans to surrounding<br />
area<br />
Consortium incl.<br />
Nationale Nederlanden<br />
selected<br />
architects to design<br />
<strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />
Multi (and<br />
VendexKBB)<br />
came with final<br />
redevelopment<br />
plan<br />
Achmea and<br />
Multi selected<br />
Vandenhove to<br />
design Nieuwe Blok<br />
- -<br />
Several investors<br />
selected architects to<br />
design their property<br />
(Table 8.1)<br />
Multi (and the local<br />
government) selected<br />
Galí to design <strong>public</strong><br />
<strong>space</strong> and Tusquets to<br />
design Arena<br />
Process - - - -<br />
Finance Investor Nationale<br />
Nederlanden (later<br />
ING) financed 7/8 of<br />
total costs<br />
Insurance<br />
company Achmea<br />
contributed by<br />
purchasing land for<br />
Several investors<br />
contributed by<br />
purchasing land for<br />
Bijenkorf, V&D, and<br />
Nationale Nederlanden<br />
contributed by<br />
purchasing land for<br />
Arena<br />
Nieuwe Blok Klanderij (Table 8.1)<br />
Maintenance Carried out by<br />
Actys on behest of<br />
consortium incl.<br />
investors ING and<br />
Focas<br />
- - -<br />
Source: Interviews (2006)<br />
166