25.09.2015 Views

Changing public space

Changing public space

Changing public space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This suggests that the private sector is mainly interested in participating in the redevelopment<br />

of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> when the total project involves new (preferably retail) constructions rather than<br />

the mere beautification of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>. Therefore, it is not surprising that the four PPP squares<br />

all show an increase of retail in the surrounding property (i.e., the construction of shops in the<br />

Beurstraverse, the Nieuwe Blok at the Statenplein, the Arena and Stoa at the Loeffplein, and the<br />

Bijenkorf and upgrading of the V&D and Klanderij at the Van Heekplein). Some informants<br />

stressed that there are examples where the private sector is willing to invest in non-retail squares,<br />

but this mainly concerns housing associations involved in the upgrading of residential squares<br />

located outside the city centre rather than, for example, cultural squares:<br />

That’s logical [that the private sector is not involved in cultural squares], because it has<br />

no control over what will happen in those ‘temples of culture’ and thus the return is<br />

unpredictable. However, there are examples of places you can redevelop with support<br />

of associations that own the surrounding property. In that case, control and financial<br />

advantages are more predictable. For example the Mercatorplein in Amsterdam, where<br />

associations could obtain capital from the bank to co-finance the design of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

based on the expected increase in value of the association’s property. (Designer II)<br />

However, co-financing <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong> is often limited to large investors. Individual shop-owners are<br />

usually not very eager to participate in urban redevelopment, because they feel that they would<br />

be performing a task of the local government. Table 8.3 shows the role of the private sector in the<br />

redevelopment of the PPP squares. The private actors seem particularly involved in the finance<br />

and design of <strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong>, which is elaborated in Section 8.3.1 and 8.3.3. In contrast, developers<br />

Table 8.3 Role of the private sector in the redevelopment of the PPP squares<br />

Initiative<br />

Design<br />

Beurstraverse Statenplein Van Heekplein Loeffplein<br />

Developer Multi took<br />

initiative to expand<br />

C&A’s upgrading<br />

plans to surrounding<br />

area<br />

Consortium incl.<br />

Nationale Nederlanden<br />

selected<br />

architects to design<br />

<strong>public</strong> <strong>space</strong><br />

Multi (and<br />

VendexKBB)<br />

came with final<br />

redevelopment<br />

plan<br />

Achmea and<br />

Multi selected<br />

Vandenhove to<br />

design Nieuwe Blok<br />

- -<br />

Several investors<br />

selected architects to<br />

design their property<br />

(Table 8.1)<br />

Multi (and the local<br />

government) selected<br />

Galí to design <strong>public</strong><br />

<strong>space</strong> and Tusquets to<br />

design Arena<br />

Process - - - -<br />

Finance Investor Nationale<br />

Nederlanden (later<br />

ING) financed 7/8 of<br />

total costs<br />

Insurance<br />

company Achmea<br />

contributed by<br />

purchasing land for<br />

Several investors<br />

contributed by<br />

purchasing land for<br />

Bijenkorf, V&D, and<br />

Nationale Nederlanden<br />

contributed by<br />

purchasing land for<br />

Arena<br />

Nieuwe Blok Klanderij (Table 8.1)<br />

Maintenance Carried out by<br />

Actys on behest of<br />

consortium incl.<br />

investors ING and<br />

Focas<br />

- - -<br />

Source: Interviews (2006)<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!