Burnishing Bigotry - 3rd edition

°Clobber Passage B) Matthew 19 … This also-famous passage has Jesus stating that,
―Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning made them male and
female? . … For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and
the two shall become one flesh‖ (from Matthew 19:4-5, citing Genesis 2:23-24), and while it is true
that a conservatively literal interpretation of these verses could be construed to have Jesus saying
that only heterosexual unions between one man & one woman are sanctified, when we look at
the greater context of this passage we see that this is clearly not what he is doing here.
Consider the implications of the following two facts:
Fact #01) Even though polygamy was indeed becoming less & less acceptable during
the Second Temple Period (the final years thereof being when this passage in Matthew 19 was uttered),
it was still an officially accepted form of marriage at the time. Paul himself verified this fact in 1
Corinthians 7:32-35, when he noted that men with more than one wife shouldn‘t serve in the
church leadership (presumably out of concern that a man with multiple wives wouldn‘t have the time to
properly care for both his church and his larger family).
Fact #02) During the time of Jesus‘ ministry there existed quite the strident conflict
between two major factions of Judaism, and part of their conflict concerned the theme of divorce
– specifically how & when a married couple could become legally separated in the eyes of the
Lord. The leader the first group, Rabbi Shammai, taught that the Hebrew word ―displeasing‖ in
Deuteronomy 24:1 meant that only a very serious transgression could allow a couple to legally
separate (making divorce extremely difficult to effectuate) … The leader of the opposing faction,
Rabbi Hillel, taught that almost any displeasure would satisfy this verse (making a divorce
extremely easy to obtain). As such, when we keep this fact in mind and re-read the text in
question, we see that Jesus is not commenting on marriage at all, but is rather talking about
divorce – publicly supporting the far more conservative interpretation of Deuteronomy 24:1
offered by Rabbi Shammai, and rejecting the more lenient interpretation thereof proposed by
Rabbi Hillel. In essence, then, the question being posed to Jesus in Matthew 19 is not ―What is
an acceptable marriage‖, but rather ―When is it acceptable to divorce?‖
―Some Pharisees came to [Jesus], and to test him they asked, ‗Is it lawful for a man to divorce his
wife for any reason?‘ And he answered, ‗Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning
made them male and female?‘ and he said, ‗For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and
be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh‘? So they are no longer two, but one flesh.
Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.‘ And then they asked him, ‗Why then did
Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?‘ And he answered them, ‗It was
because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning
it was not so. And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife … and marries another commits adultery.‖
~ Matthew 19:3-9
987