27.07.2023 Views

DeConick A.D

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

284

THE PI OF POLITICS

systems and ideologies and must serve as the ultimate point of moral

reference (62). Basilides, Valentinus, and their gnostic friends would have

exclaimed, “Amen!”

Sociological studies of countercultural movements show that, for some

people, transgression can become a flagship, a way to mobilize and revolutionize

an environment that has left them powerless. These types of movements

can lead to political coups and violence (Franzese 2009, 30–31;

Wolfreys 2008, 4; Cresswell 1996, 163–76). But this did not happen with

the Gnostics, who must have known that taking up arms against Rome

was futile. Instead, the Gnostics turned their transgression into a celestial

coup to overthrow the demonic horde that controls our world and puts

our kings and princes in power. They felt that if they could gain control

of the terror at its roots by disarming the rulers of the heavens, then the

heavenly rulers’ human representatives, the kings, would be sure to fall.

Even more countercultural was the Gnostic belief that the human displaced

the gods. The human had crossed over the boundary that had so

long separated the gods from the human. Now the human was out of

place, a divine being no longer afraid of the gods, the ancestors, or the

obligations of traditional rank. Gnostics were free of the social and political

restraints that their gods and ancestors had imposed upon them for

centuries. The Romans were right. This was revolutionary and dangerous.

Gnostic Strategies

When we look at the ancient religious landscape, it is clear that it was

a highly competitive marketplace (Sanders 2000; Lieu 2002, 69–79;

Brakke 2006). The testimonies of the Apostolic Catholic leaders reveal

fierce competition between Gnostic Christian communities and Catholic

churches. On the most basic level, the fight was over parishioners—who

had them, who could keep them, and who could take them away. Gnostics

of different stripes were accused of successfully persuading many Apostolic

Catholics to join their communities (Irenaeus, Against the Heresies 1.16.3,

3.15.2). Specific charismatics are identified as most successful, such as Marcus,

who drew away members from other churches in Gaul (1.13.1).

What strategies did Gnostics rely on to bring in and keep new parishioners?

Although one of the primary factors in conversion was one’s social

networks and affiliations to family, friends, and patrons already inside the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!