27.07.2023 Views

DeConick A.D

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63

THE GNOSTIC TRUE MAN

tic assertion that the nous (or pneuma, as the Gnostics preferred) is the

uncreated God within the human.

Although Philo thought very highly of the human nous, he is unwilling

to conceive of it as God within, as the Gnostics understood this, and

makes highly detailed arguments to this effect. He walks a razor’s edge

between exaltation of the nous as divine and subordination of it as human.

For Philo, the nous was the piece of the puzzle that helped explain

the oddities of the creation story in the Bible. How can it be, he wondered,

that chapter 1 of Genesis articulates a story about the creation of

humankind in the image of God, while chapter 2 tells about Adam being

fashioned from dust?

Philo solves this problem by arguing that chapter 1 refers to the creation

of a heavenly man, whereas chapter 2 refers to the creation of an earthly

man. The heavenly man is the ideal model for the creation of the earthly

man. He is the spiritual prototype, the archetypal human being molded

in the image of God. Philo calls this figure the Logos (Reason), as well as

Nous (Mind). This figure represents mind or reason on the universal level.

Chapter 2 of Genesis refers to the formation of the earthly man from

clay—Adam, who is endowed with a living breath. The earthly man is the

visible, physical human that is formed with an individual human mind.

The model for this human being is the heavenly man, who is God’s image.

For Philo, then, the individual human mind is the sovereign element

of the soul, the aspect of the human that is most akin to God (Philo, De

opificio mundi 69). It is the common denominator between human and

God, linking them in kind (Kooten 2008, 272–75). The human being is

more like God than any other creature on earth, Philo writes, because

the human possesses a mind, which is “a closer likeness and copy than

anything else on earth of the eternal and blessed Archetype” (Philo, De

decalogo 134).

But how did our minds get into our bodies? What are they made of?

Since Philo assumes that the mind is the closest thing to God we possess,

certainly it could not have been created merely from the clay that was

used to fashion Adam’s body. Philo insists that something has to happen

to the “earthlike” human mind to make it incorruptible (Philo, De opificio

mundi 135, 139–140). But what?

This is where Genesis 2:7 helps him out: “Then the Lord God formed

man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!