22.01.2013 Views

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEMODULATION PIXELS IN CMOS/CCD 147<br />

5.3 Outlook: Two-photosite demodulation pixel<br />

The 1-tap pixel, introduced and characterized in the previous sections, suffers from<br />

one major drawback compared to pixel realizations <strong>with</strong> more storage sites: Since<br />

only one storage site is available per pixel, the sampling points have to be acquired<br />

sequentially rather than in parallel and therefore the pixel has problems in<br />

measuring fast changing scenes that require long integration times. In such scenes,<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the sequentially acquired sampling points per pixel could possibly belong to<br />

another region <strong>of</strong> the scene, assuming that the scene has changed (moved)<br />

between the acquisition <strong>of</strong> the sampling points.<br />

This problem can be overcome by a slightly modified pixel structure, the twophotosite<br />

demodulation pixel, which we suggest in this section for a future<br />

realization. The following things are changed <strong>with</strong> respect to the 1-tap device:<br />

(1) Since we use an integration time <strong>of</strong> half the modulation period, the<br />

photoelectrons that are dumped during integration <strong>of</strong> a sampling point directly<br />

correspond to the 180° delayed sampling point. Instead <strong>of</strong> draining this charge<br />

to a dump diffusion it will now be integrated in a second storage site <strong>with</strong>in the<br />

pixel.<br />

(2) The two-photosite demodulation pixel will consist <strong>of</strong> two equal structures<br />

according to the description under (1), which are operated in quadrature. In this<br />

way the first site acquires the sampling points A0 and A2 (phase 0° and 180°<br />

respectively) and the second site acquires the sampling points A1 and A3 (phase<br />

90° and 270°), so that all sampling points are acquired in parallel.<br />

(3) In order to achieve this, both photosites <strong>with</strong>in the pixel are illuminated <strong>with</strong> the<br />

same optical scene information. A special microlens array is suggested, which<br />

(a) makes an optical averaging <strong>of</strong> the complete optical information imaged to<br />

one pixel and (b) focuses the spatially averaged pixel information in equal<br />

proportions to both light sensitive photosites. In addition to the generation <strong>of</strong> two<br />

optically identical photosites, such a microlens structure can increase the optical<br />

fill factor up to 100%, a factor <strong>of</strong> 2 compared to the realization <strong>with</strong>out microlens<br />

array, and even a factor <strong>of</strong> 5 compared to our current 1-tap pixel realization.<br />

The microlens structure is relatively simple to realize and mount, since the chip<br />

structure only varies in one dimension.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!