22.01.2013 Views

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOLID-STATE IMAGE SENSING 61<br />

Width <strong>of</strong> depletion layer (um)<br />

6.00<br />

5.00<br />

4.00<br />

3.00<br />

2.00<br />

1.00<br />

0.00<br />

0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> integrated electrons<br />

Figure 3.9 MOS photogate: Depletion width versus number <strong>of</strong> integrated free<br />

electrons. (Effective gate voltage:10 V, substrate doping 4⋅10 14 cm -3 ,<br />

gate size: 10 µm x 5 µm, oxide thickness: 40 nm).<br />

Free charge carriers (electron hole pairs) are generally generated both optically and<br />

thermally. It is, however, not possible to distinguish between optically generated<br />

and thermally generated electrons. Both are integrated in the same potential<br />

bucket. The thermal generation is therefore an unwanted effect (dark current) which<br />

is sometimes reduced by cooling the CCD devices.<br />

At this point we also understand the relatively large voltage requirements for CCDs.<br />

The larger the voltages applied to the CCD gates, the higher the CCD’s charge<br />

handling capability is. High voltages, on the other hand, increase the risk <strong>of</strong> oxide<br />

break-through. This again is the reason why CCD processes use relatively thick<br />

oxides, making them less suited for the realization <strong>of</strong> good MOS transistors.<br />

Most CCDs have transparent photogates <strong>of</strong> polysilicon and are illuminated from the<br />

front side (as the CCDs in this work). The polysilicon gates cause some additional<br />

losses in quantum efficiency, especially in the blue (short wavelengths) and also<br />

additional thin film interference peaks. Figure 3.10 shows the quantum efficiency<br />

<strong>measurement</strong>s <strong>of</strong> (CCD-) photogates (poly1 and poly2 photogates) realized in<br />

2.0µm Orbit CMOS/CCD process, the process we used in the framework <strong>of</strong> this<br />

dissertation for the realization <strong>of</strong> the demodulation pixels.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!