22.01.2013 Views

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with custom - Universität ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOLID-STATE IMAGE SENSING 51<br />

out by sequentially connecting the low impedance pixel-amplifier to the output,<br />

rather than the high-impedance nodes <strong>of</strong> the photodiodes. The APS principle,<br />

sketched in Figure 3.1 d, <strong>of</strong>fers low conversion capacitance and hence good<br />

sensitivity and low noise performance, gradually approaching CCD performance.<br />

Another advantage is the possibility to read out and reset single pixels by selecting<br />

them <strong>with</strong> the proper address at the row- and column- address decoder. This<br />

makes it possible to define so-called regions <strong>of</strong> interest (ROI) and to increase the<br />

image frame rate locally. Also, in general each pixel can be operated <strong>with</strong> an<br />

individual integration time. However, compared to CCDs, CMOS APS imagers <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

have a poorer image quality. This is because they suffer from an effect known as<br />

fixed pattern noise (FPN): due to variations in oxide thickness, size <strong>of</strong> gate area<br />

and doping concentrations over the sensor, each pixel has a different <strong>of</strong>fset (up to<br />

some 10mV differences) and a slightly different gain, (which can usually be<br />

neglected). Therefore, external FPN correction is required; an effort, which is not<br />

necessary if using CCDs. FPN correction subtracts a locally stored dark image from<br />

the actually acquired image, thus eliminating the fixed pattern noise. Recently,<br />

approaches such as sensor-integrated correlated double sampling (CDS) or the<br />

active column principle have been demonstrated, <strong>of</strong>fering ways to overcome the<br />

FPN problem [HOP, DEC, VOG].<br />

The basic difference between CCD (charge domain signal processing) and CMOS<br />

APS (in general voltage domain signal processing) is illustrated by the hydrostatic<br />

equivalents in Figure 3.1 a+b. CCD imagers locally collect charge carriers to<br />

transport them physically to the output stage, where they are converted into a<br />

voltage. In contrast, CMOS APS sensors generate the signal voltage already in the<br />

pixel. The information can then be directly connected to the output.<br />

Both CCD and CMOS APS are realized in MOS-technologies (Metal Oxide<br />

Semiconductor), mostly in silicon. The special processes, however, are optimized<br />

towards different goals. So it is usually not possible to realize good CCDs <strong>with</strong> a<br />

CMOS process or to realize efficient CMOS circuitry in a CCD technology. An<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> the most important and relevant electrical and optical properties <strong>of</strong><br />

silicon for image sensing is given in Section 3.1. The following sections then focus<br />

on specific principles and properties <strong>of</strong> CCD (Section 3.2) and CMOS APS sensors<br />

(Section 3.3). More detailed information can be found in the references [TEU, BEY,<br />

SEQ, SZ1, SZ2, PS1, PS2, FOS].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!