27.08.2013 Views

Libro de Resúmenes / Book of Abstracts (Español/English)

Libro de Resúmenes / Book of Abstracts (Español/English)

Libro de Resúmenes / Book of Abstracts (Español/English)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resumenes 93<br />

punto <strong>de</strong> equilibrio y oscilaciones <strong>de</strong> población amortiguadas, analizando un<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>lo <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>predación tiempo continuo <strong>de</strong>scrito por el sistema:<br />

⎧ dx x<br />

⎪ = r(<br />

1−<br />

) x − q ( x − xr<br />

) y<br />

dt K<br />

X µ : ⎨<br />

⎪ dy<br />

= ( p ( x − x − c)<br />

y<br />

⎪<br />

r )<br />

⎩ dt<br />

y consi<strong>de</strong>rando las siguientes hipótesis acerca <strong>de</strong>l refugio <strong>de</strong> las presas: el<br />

número <strong>de</strong> presas protegidas xr es ya sea una fracción constante <strong>de</strong>l total,<br />

un número fijo [9], o proporcional a la abundancia <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>predadores [11].<br />

Nuestros resultados indican que el refugio pue<strong>de</strong> preservar la estabilidad <strong>de</strong>l<br />

punto <strong>de</strong> equilibrio positivo <strong>de</strong>l sistema.<br />

Dynamics <strong>of</strong> simple predator-prey mo<strong>de</strong>ls with prey refuge<br />

use. A small review and new findings<br />

Within the field <strong>of</strong> population dynamics, the so-called predator<br />

functional response to prey <strong>de</strong>nsity refers to the <strong>de</strong>nsity <strong>of</strong> prey attacked<br />

per unit time per predator as a function <strong>of</strong> prey <strong>de</strong>nsity [5]. In most<br />

predator-prey mo<strong>de</strong>ls consi<strong>de</strong>red in the literature, the functional response is<br />

assumed to be monotonically increasing, the inherent assumption being<br />

that the more prey in the environment, the better <strong>of</strong>f the predator.<br />

To incorporate biological realism into the basic formal framework<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped in the first half <strong>of</strong> the XX century by Volterra and others, <strong>de</strong>nsity<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

effects on the endogenous dynamic <strong>of</strong> predators and prey, and<br />

non-linear functions for consumption <strong>of</strong> prey by predators were inclu<strong>de</strong>d [3,<br />

7]. More recently, the behavior <strong>of</strong> prey and its consequences at the<br />

population level has been incorporated into the predation theory [13]. In<br />

this context, one <strong>of</strong> the more relevant behavioral traits affecting the<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> predator-prey systems is the use <strong>of</strong> spatial refuges by the prey.<br />

Here we consi<strong>de</strong>r a refuge as a physical location in which prey either live or<br />

temporarily hi<strong>de</strong> [9], where predators have little or no chance to kill prey.<br />

According to Taylor [15] the different kinds <strong>of</strong> refuges can be<br />

arranged into three types:<br />

a) those which provi<strong>de</strong>s permanent spatial protection for a small<br />

subset <strong>of</strong> the prey population,<br />

b) those which provi<strong>de</strong> temporary spatial protection, and<br />

c) those which provi<strong>de</strong> a temporal refuge in numbers, i.e. <strong>de</strong>crease<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> predation by increasing the abundance <strong>of</strong> vulnerable prey.<br />

From a theoretical point <strong>of</strong> view, different forms <strong>of</strong> mathematical<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> refuge use in a population context have been presented.<br />

These mo<strong>de</strong>ls, mostly invoking either environment heterogeneity or some<br />

type <strong>of</strong> phenotypic structure in the prey, relies on different basic<br />

assumptions and therefore their results are hardly comparable.<br />

Different forms <strong>of</strong> mathematical representations <strong>of</strong> refuge have been<br />

used in a population context; some invoke environment heterogeneity while<br />

others some type <strong>of</strong> phenotypic structure in the prey. However, because<br />

they rely on different basic assumptions their results are hardly comparable.<br />

By analyzing a continuous time predator-prey mo<strong>de</strong>l <strong>de</strong>scribed by the<br />

system:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!