effets potentiels de l'harmonie des personnalitÃ©s des membres d ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

172 Annexe 3 L'explication du rapport du questionnaire IPIP-NEO
173 IPIP-NEO Narrative Report explanation Il This report estima tes the individual's level on each of the five broad persona lit y domains of the Five-Factor Model. The description of each one of the five broad domains is followed by a more detailed description of persona lit y according to the six subdomains that comprise each domain. A note on termina/ogy. Personality traits describe, relative to other people, the frequency or intensity of a person's feelings, thoughts, or behaviors. Possession of a trait is therefore a matter of degree. We might describe two individuals as extra verts, but still see one as more extraverted than the other. This report uses expressions such as "extravert" or "high in extraversion" to describe someone who is likely to be seen by others as relatively extraverted. The computer program that generates this report classifies you as low, average, or high in a trait according to whether your score is approximately in the lowest 30%, middle 40%, or highest 30% of scores obtained by people of your sex and roughly your age. Your numerica l scores are reported and graphed as percentile estimates. For example, a score of "60" means that your level on that trait is estimated to be higher than 60% ofpersons ofyour sex and age. Please keep in mind that "Iow," "average," and "high" scores on a persona lit y test are neither absolutely good nor bad. A particular level on any trait will probably be neutral or irrelevant for a great many activites, be helpful for accomplishing some things, and detrimental for accomplishing other things. As with any personality inventory, scores and descriptions can only approximate an individual's actual personality. High and low score descriptions are usually accurate, but average scores close to the low or high boundaries might misclassify you as only average. On each set of six subdomain scales it is somewhat uncommon but certainly possible to score high in some of the subdomains and low in the others. In such cases more attention should be paid to the subdomain scores than to the broad domain score. Questions about the accuracy of your res ults are best resolved by showing your report to people who know you weil. John A. Johnso n wrote descriptions of the five domains and thirty subdomains. These descriptions are based on an extensive reading of the scientific Iiterature on personality measurement. Although Dr. Johnson would like to be acknowledged as the author of these materials if the y are reproduced, he has placed them in the public domain. Extraversion Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy being with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, actionoriented, individuals who are Iikely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they Iike to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves. Introverts lack the exuberance, energy, and activity levels of extra verts. They tend to be quiet, low-key, deliberate, and disengaged from the social world. Their lack of social involvement should not be interpreted as shyness or depression; the introvert simply needs less stimulation than an extra vert and prefers to be alone. The independence and reserve of the introvert is sometimes mistaken as unfriendliness or arrogance. In reality, an introvert who scores high on the agreeableness dimension will not seek others out but will be quite pleasant when approached. Extraversion Facets I l http://www.personal.psu.edu/ j5j/IPIP/ consulté février 2008.
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI
Page 3 and 4:
REMERCIEMENTS Tout abord, je dois r
Page 5 and 6:
III AVANT-PROPOS Ce mémoire est un
Page 7 and 8:
v Aujourd'hui, de nombreuses person
Page 9 and 10:
VII 1.5 Les rôles et les comportem
Page 11 and 12:
IX LISTE DES TABLEAUX Tableau 1. Le
Page 13 and 14:
Xl LISTE DES FIGURES Figure 1. Le m
Page 15 and 16:
2 scientifiques de la personnalité
Page 17 and 18:
4 CHAPITRE 1 LA REVUE DE LITTÉRATU
Page 19 and 20:
6 Type intuition • Considère les
Page 21 and 22:
8 10 autres traits (Hansenne, M. 20
Page 23 and 24:
10 QI. Ouverture au changement Atta
Page 25 and 26:
12 que les cmq facteurs constituent
Page 27 and 28:
14 allez obtenir beaucoup de bonnes
Page 29 and 30:
16 Tableau 4. Les neuf types princi
Page 31 and 32:
18 9 7 2 5 4 Figure 3. Le groupemen
Page 33 and 34:
20 style de vie (Dufrenne, M. 1953)
Page 35 and 36:
22 traiter ses patients et former s
Page 37 and 38:
24 attention à la relation entre l
Page 39 and 40:
26 que la recherche clinique. La m
Page 41 and 42:
28 Robert R. McCrae ont développé
Page 43 and 44:
30 Tableau 6. Les facteurs du Big F
Page 45 and 46:
32 l'attitude et les comportements
Page 47 and 48:
34 Aujourd'hui, l'influence de la p
Page 49 and 50:
36 travail (Lapid-Bogda, G. 2004).
Page 51 and 52:
38 possèdent le plus haut niveau d
Page 53 and 54:
40 L'harmonie entre les personnalit
Page 55 and 56:
42 t . Phase Initiale . . , . Ph~se
Page 57 and 58:
44 d'une éq uipe. Presque toutes l
Page 59 and 60:
46 correspondances entre les tâche
Page 61 and 62:
48 Voici un exemple dans la recherc
Page 63 and 64:
50 attitudes positives. Dans notre
Page 65 and 66:
52 élément qui correspond au nive
Page 67 and 68:
54 CHAPITRE 2 LA MÉTHODOLOGIE 2.1
Page 69 and 70:
56 2.2 Le but de la recherche Parmi
Page 71 and 72:
58 et son client. Le fonctionnement
Page 73 and 74:
60 Départements du client 1 l J 1
Page 75 and 76:
62 SYSTÈME DE COMl'\WNICATlON QUOT
Page 77 and 78:
64 SYSTÈME: DE CO"MUNICATION QUOTI
Page 79 and 80:
66 La durée, le coût, et la quali
Page 81 and 82:
68 Le questionnaire d'internet Le m
Page 83 and 84:
70 IPIP-NEO et de Big Five j'ai tro
Page 85 and 86:
72 ont 43 ans. Pour faciliter l'ana
Page 87 and 88:
74 Avec l'IPIP-NEO, on peut compare
Page 89 and 90:
76 Par rapport à la quantité limi
Page 91 and 92:
78 L'harmonie du questionnaire de r
Page 93 and 94:
80 Tableau 12. L'exemple des tâche
Page 95 and 96:
82 Dans le questionnaire préparé
Page 97 and 98:
84 Tableau 15. L'exemple des résul
Page 99 and 100:
86 CHAPITRE 3 LES RÉSULTATS 3.1 Le
Page 101 and 102:
88 l'information est transférée l
Page 103 and 104:
90 capacité de travail de leurs co
Page 105 and 106:
92 L'équipe B La création de l'é
Page 107 and 108:
94 Pour fonctionner dans l'équipe
Page 109 and 110:
96 3.2 Les résultats pour la perso
Page 111 and 112:
98 haut. (Voir le niveau d'écart s
Page 113 and 114:
100 Tableau 26. Le niveau d'écart
Page 115 and 116:
102 Par rapport aux tableaux 14, 15
Page 117 and 118:
104 Ici s'arrêtent les comparaison
Page 119 and 120:
0 106 Tableau 29. Le niveau d'écar
Page 121 and 122:
108 L'harmonie D'après les résult
Page 123 and 124:
110 niveau du facteur A est très
Page 125 and 126:
112 En comparant les notes sur le n
Page 127 and 128:
114 L'équipe B Comme dans le cas d
Page 129 and 130:
116 • Les groupes 7 et 9 formés
Page 131 and 132:
118 Tableau 32. Les résultats des
Page 133 and 134: 120 autrement dit, les personnes qu
Page 135 and 136: 122 La figure 13 montre que selon l
Page 137 and 138: 124 d'équipe. Il est possible que
Page 139 and 140: 126 LES LIMITES DE LA RECHERCHE Ma
Page 141 and 142: 128 qu'à un petit échantillon, le
Page 143 and 144: 130 limité notre cadre conceptuel
Page 145 and 146: 132 résultats de la personnalité
Page 147 and 148: 134 BIBLIOGRAPHIE Ressources biblio
Page 149 and 150: 136 Cattell, R. B.; Eber, H. W.; Ta
Page 151 and 152: 138 Eriksson, P. E.; Westerberg, M.
Page 153 and 154: 140 498. Kerzner, H. 2006. Project
Page 155 and 156: 142 McCrae, R. R.; Costa, P. T. 198
Page 157 and 158: 144 Renge kexue, 1 re édition en c
Page 159 and 160: Yang, J.; McCrae, R. R.; Costa, P.
Page 161 and 162: ANNEXES 148
Page 163 and 164: QUESTIONNAIRE POUR LA RECHERCHE: EF
Page 165 and 166: 3 INSTRUCTIONS Tous les membres de
Page 167 and 168: 5 2. Équipe consacrée à un proje
Page 169 and 170: 7 PARTIE II - QUESTIONS GÉNÉRALES
Page 171 and 172: 9 PARTIE IV - ÉVALUATION POUR L'É
Page 173 and 174: 161 Short Form for the IPIP-NEO (In
Page 175 and 176: 163 ~r--I Ge t angry casily:-----IV
Page 177 and 178: 165 ------'--1 r34~---- f8'~lie~-;-
Page 179 and 180: 167 116-1.-·i 'Am ,f"ld of m,"y V'
Page 181 and 182: 169 1 88 ~---I Tend t ;;-vote for -
Page 183: 17 1 ~R e m ai n ca l ~~~de r--"-~Y
Page 187 and 188: 175 relationships is necessary. Peo
Page 189 and 190: 177 At the other end of the scale,
Page 191 and 192: 179 Annexe 4 Les comparassions entr
Page 193: 181 Adventurousness Actions (04) 4+
show all

effets potentiels de l'harmonie des personnalitÃ©s des membres d ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?