23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rootstock field trials were established in three-four replications with 4 trees in<br />

each experimental plot. Tree planting distances were 5 x 2.5–3 m. Orchard floor<br />

management combined herbicide strips in the rows and frequent mown sward between<br />

the rows. In the f<strong>ir</strong>st experiments tree canopies were trained close to the<br />

natural, in recent ones – as spindles.<br />

Tree growth vigour in the f<strong>ir</strong>st year of growth was assessed by total shoot<br />

length or tree height, latter – by trunk diameter. Yield was recorded for the whole<br />

experimental plot and recalculated to the yield per tree or per hectare. Annual yield<br />

efficiency was calculated as a ratio of tree yield with trunk cross-section area (TCSA).<br />

Final yield efficiency is a sum of annual efficiencies. Average fruit weight was determined<br />

on a representative sample of 100 fruits per each experimental plot. Rootstock<br />

suckering was evaluated in scores (0–5 scale, where 0 – no suckers; 5 –<br />

abundant suckering) or number of suckers per tree was calculated. Tree mortality<br />

was expressed as a percent of dead trees at the end of experiment.<br />

For data statistical evaluation LSD 05<br />

or Duncan test was used.<br />

Results. Cherry rootstocks. Seedlings derived from accidental P. mahaleb, P.<br />

avium or P. cerasus seeds were used as rootstocks for sour and sweet cherries.<br />

After the experiments carried out by A. ðumskis in 1984–1998 seedlings of sweet<br />

cherry cv. ‘Zolotaja Losickaja’, selection form No. 2 and two forms of P. mahaleb<br />

(No. 817 and No. 805) were recommended as rootstocks for sour cherries (Ðumskis,<br />

2001). Cherry trees on seedlings of mentioned forms ensured more uniform tree<br />

growth and higher yields of good quality fruits. Tree survival on these rootstocks<br />

was better. They withstand well cold winter of 1986–1987 and other unfavorable<br />

conditions during the years of the experiment.<br />

Parallel search of clonal rootstocks was started in the nursery. There were<br />

selected some winter hardy, disease resistant and easy propagating by green cuttings<br />

clonal rootstocks: PN (P. cerasus), P3, P7 (both P. padus x (P. cerasus x P. avium)<br />

all bread at the Nonchernoziom Institute of Horticulture in Russia (Åâñòðàòîâ, 1986)<br />

and Þ1 (P. cerasus) selected at the LIH (Ðumskis, 1997). The<strong>ir</strong> testing in the orchard<br />

was started in 1999. Mentioned rootstocks were tested with both sour and sweet<br />

cherries. P. mahaleb seedlings served as a control.<br />

The most vigorous sour cherry trees in the young age were on rootstock P7<br />

(Table 1). With the rest of rootstocks tree growth was similar. Yield per tree, yield<br />

efficiency and average fruit weight was not significantly affected by the rootstock<br />

(Lanauskas, 2005 a). The most suckering rootstocks were P3 and P7. The highest<br />

tree mortality was on rootstocks P7 and PN. None of tested rootstocks showed<br />

better than standard one – P. mahaleb seedlings.<br />

The least growth of sweet cherries was on rootstocks Þ1 and P7 (Table 2).<br />

Tree mortality on these rootstocks was the highest (Lanauskas, 2005 b). The most<br />

vigorous trees were on rootstock PN, but the<strong>ir</strong> trunk diameter was close to the one<br />

of trees on P3 and P. mahaleb seedlings. The highest yield and yield efficiency was<br />

of trees on rootstock P3, but this rootstock suckered profusely. The lowest yield<br />

and yield efficiency was recorded for trees on P. mahaleb seedlings.<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!