23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

23. Àëåêñååâà Ò. Ï., Ïåðôèëüåâà Â. Ä., Êðèíèöûí Ã. Ã. Êîìïëåêñíîå îðãàííî-ìèíåðàëüíoe<br />

óäîáðåíèe ïðîëîíãèðîâàííîãî äåéñòâèÿ íà îñíîâå òîðôà //<br />

Õèìèÿ ðàñòèòåëüíîãî ñûðüÿ. 1999. ¹ 4. Ñ. 53–59.<br />

24. Àóòêî À. À. Â ìèðå îâîùåé. Ìèíñê, 2004. Ñ. 207–231.<br />

<strong>25</strong>. Áîéêî Ã., Âàêóëåíêî Ð. Äîçû è ñïîñîáû âíåñåíèÿ ìèíåðàëüíûõ óäîáðåíèé<br />

íà óðîæàéíîñòü ìîðêîâè // Sodininkystë <strong>ir</strong> darþininkystë. 1999. 18(3). P. 101–106.<br />

26. Ãóìàíþê À. Â., Ãàìàþí È. Ì., Êîðîâàé Â. È, Àíäðèåø À. Í.,<br />

Áîæàêîâñêàÿ Ë. Å. Âëèÿíèå âèäîâ, äîç óäîáðåíèé è ñïîñîáîâ èõ âíåñåíèÿ íà<br />

ïðîäóêòèâíîñòü îâîùíûõ êóëüòóð // Ìàò. êîíô. ïîñâ. 80-ëåòèþ ‚ÐÓÏ Èíñòèòóò<br />

îâîùåâîäñòâà ÍÀÈ Áåëîðóñè‘. Ýôôåêòèâíîå îâîùåâîäñòâî â ñîâðåìåííûõ<br />

óñëîâèÿõ. Ìèíñê, 2005. 2<strong>25</strong>–227.<br />

27. Äåðþãèí È. Ï., Êóëþêèí À. Í. Àãðîõèìè÷åñêèå îñíîâû ñèñòåìû<br />

óäîáðåíèÿ îâîùíûõ è ïëîäîâûõ êóëüòóð. 1988. 269 c.<br />

28. Ïåðåäíåâ Â. Ï. Óäîáðåíèå îâîùíûõ êóëüòóð. Ìèíñê, 1987. C. 144.<br />

29. Ïîñòíèêîâ À. Â., Ðÿáûõ Ð. Ñ., Áàéêîâà Ñ.È. è äð. Îñîáåííîñòè<br />

âîçäåëûâàíèÿ îâîùíûõ êóëüòóð íà öåîëèòîâûõ ñóáñòðàòàõ â òåïëèöàõ // Ñá.<br />

Èñïîëüçîâàíèe ïðèðîäíûõ öåîëèòîâ â íàðîäíîì õîçÿéñòâå. ÑÎ ÐÀÍ.<br />

Íîâîñèáèðñê, 1991a. Ñ. 162–168.<br />

30. Ïîñòíèêîâ À. Â., Çåêóíîâ Ô. Â., Åëèñååâà Í. À. Îâîùíûå êóëüòóðû ïðè<br />

âûðàùèâàíèè íà öåîëèòå // Õèìèçàöèÿ ñåëüñêîãî õîçÿéñòâà. 1991b. ¹ 11. Ñ. 22–<strong>25</strong>.<br />

31. ßêîâëåâà Í. Í. Ýôôåêòèâíîñòü ðåñóðñîñáåðåãàþùèõ òåõíîëîãèé<br />

âûðàùèâàíèÿ îâîùíûõ êóëüòóð íà öåîëèòñîäåðæàùèõ òåïëè÷íûõ ñóáñòðàòàõ //<br />

Ãàâðèø, 2004. ¹ 3. Ñ. 6–8.<br />

SODININKYSTË IR DARÞININKYSTË. SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES. 2006. <strong>25</strong>(4).<br />

INFLUENCE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN<br />

FERTILIZERS AND ZEOLITE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND<br />

MORPHOMETRICS INDICES OF CARROT<br />

O. Bundiniene, C. Bobinas, P. Duchovskis<br />

Summary<br />

The possibilities of different nitrogen fertilizers have been investigated at the<br />

Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture in 2004–2005. The experiments were carried out<br />

on the sandy or sandy-loam Calc(ar)i – Epihypogleyc Luvisols (LVg-p-w-cc). The<br />

aims of investigation were to assess the efficacy influence of calcium ammonium<br />

nitre (CAN 27), nitrogen fertilizer with zeolite (CAN 27 with zeolite) and zeolite<br />

(commercial sign ZeoVit EcoAgro) and ammonium nitre (AN) on productivity and<br />

morphometrical indices (weight of root-crop, diameter of root-crop and length of<br />

root-crop) of edible carrot. The highest marketable yield (56.4 t ha -1 ) and output of<br />

marketable yield (72.7%) were obtained, when nitrogen fertilizer with zeolite (CAN<br />

27 with zeolite, N 90<br />

+ N 30<br />

) were used. Using ceolite (<strong>25</strong> t ha -1 ) and ammonium nitre<br />

(N 90<br />

+ N 30<br />

) there was obtained 55.0 t ha -1 of marketable yield, respectively, and<br />

output of marketable yield made 71.4% of total yield. The highest weight of carrot<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!