23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(1993), Adamczewski (1988), Rychcik (2005) also indicate that leguminous plants,<br />

including pea, are characterized by high susceptibility to severe weed infestation,<br />

which is connected with the<strong>ir</strong> slow growth and development in the initial period<br />

following sowing and emergence. Traditional methods of weed control, consisting<br />

mainly in harrowing, are not always effective, therefore herbicides, which protect<br />

plants against excessive weed infestation more effectively, are in common use.<br />

The aim of this study was to determine to what degree applied seed dressings<br />

protect plants against injury by diseases and pests, and applied herbicides against<br />

weeds. In addition, the effect of chemical agents on the development of plants and<br />

formation of pods in the fruit-bearing node and plant was estimated.<br />

Methods. The investigation was carried out within the framework of 3-year<br />

field experiment established in the fields of the experimental centre at Ba³cyny near<br />

Ostróda in the years 2004–2006.<br />

The following seed dressings were used, including fungicides:<br />

– Funaben T,<br />

– Sarfun T 450 FS<br />

and insecticides:<br />

– Super Homai 70 DS (+ with action against pathogens),<br />

– Gaucho 350 FS.<br />

The f<strong>ir</strong>st three dressings were used in a dose of 4 g per 1 kg of seeds, while<br />

Gaucho 350 FS dressing – in the amount of 4 ml per 1 kg of seeds. They were put<br />

onto pea seeds of 14% moisture just before sowing.<br />

Basagran 600 SL (in a dose of 2 kg/ha) and Afalon 50 WP (1.5 l/ha) were used<br />

against weeds after emergence. The weed infestation of plants was estimated with<br />

the botanical-frame method, determining the number and botanical composition of<br />

weeds per 1 m 2 in each plot.<br />

The phytopathological evaluation of plants for damages by pests was carried<br />

out in the phase of a filled pod according to the methodology of cultivar economic<br />

value (CEV) study utilized by the Main Research Centre for Cultivars of Cultivated<br />

Plants (MRCCCP) in S³upia Wielka in 9-degree scale (9 – the best, most favourable<br />

state, and 1 – the worst, least favourable state).<br />

The phytopathological evaluation of the degree of plant injury with diseases<br />

was carried out in the phase of filled pod using a 5-degree Hillstrand and Auld scale,<br />

where: 1° means below 2% of the injured area, 2° – 3–10% of the injured area, 3° –<br />

11–30% of the injured area, 4° – 31–50% of the injured area, 5° – over 50% of the<br />

injured area.<br />

Four sowing pea cultivars were involved in the experiment: ‘Brylant’, ‘Wenus’,<br />

‘Marych’ and ‘Eureka’.<br />

The field trial was performed in a split-plot design, in four replications. The<br />

experimental plot area was 14.4 m 2 .<br />

Results. It has been found out that the dynamics of germination and emergence<br />

of the seeds of treated pea was similar to the dynamics of plants grown in control<br />

plots. Emergences were good and steady and no harmful effects of the application<br />

of dressings on the course of germination and intensity and punctuality of emergence<br />

were recorded in any of the cultivars. It was only in the objects treated with<br />

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!