23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results. The results of the experiments show clearly what effect weather conditions<br />

produced on the yield of protein obtained from each pea cultivar tested. Let<br />

us not forget that the volume of protein yields was a product of two traits, i.e. seed<br />

yield volume and per cent concentration of protein in seeds, both under the d<strong>ir</strong>ect<br />

influence of weather conditions, rather than an intrinsic characteristic. Those two<br />

traits significantly varied between the years of the trial, showing a diverse d<strong>ir</strong>ection<br />

of modification. On the one hand, the mean seed yield volume for all the four pea<br />

cultivars was higher in the f<strong>ir</strong>st two years (4.38 and 4.32 dt/ha, respectively), decreasing<br />

considerably in the th<strong>ir</strong>d year (down to 3.11 dt/ha). On the other hand, the<br />

relative protein content in pea seeds was the highest in the last year of the trial<br />

(<strong>25</strong>.3%), which was considerably higher than in the f<strong>ir</strong>st two years (20.9 and 23.9%,<br />

respectively) (Tables 1 and 2). This means that the less favourable weather inhibited<br />

synthesis of non-protein compounds in pea seeds to a slightly larger extent than that<br />

of protein.<br />

Year<br />

Metai<br />

Table 1. Yield of pea seeds. Baùcyny, 2004–2006<br />

1 lentelë. Þ<strong>ir</strong>niø sëklø derlius. Baùcyny, 2004–2006 m.<br />

Cultivar<br />

Veislë<br />

‘Brylant’ ‘Wenus’ ‘Marych’ ‘Eurika’<br />

t ha -1<br />

Mean of<br />

cultivars<br />

Veislës vidurkis<br />

2004 4.48 4.61 3.49 4.95 4.38<br />

2005 4.52 4.39 3.50 4.87 4.32<br />

2006 3.35 3.21 2.83 3.03 3.11<br />

LSD (p = 0.05) for: cultivar – n.s. (not significant differences); years – 0.34; interaction of cultivar<br />

and years – n.s. / R 05<br />

: sk<strong>ir</strong>tumai tarp veisliø neesminiai, tarp metø – 0,34; veisliø <strong>ir</strong> metø –<br />

neesminiai.<br />

Table 2. Content of total protein in pea seed. Baùcyny, 2004–2006<br />

2 lentelë. Suminis baltymø kiekis þ<strong>ir</strong>niø sëklose. Baùcyny, 2004–2006 m.<br />

Cultivar<br />

Veislë<br />

Mean of<br />

cultivars<br />

Veislës vidurkis<br />

Year<br />

Metai ‘Brylant’ ‘Wenus’ ‘Marych’ ‘Eurika’<br />

%<br />

2004 20.5 20.5 21.3 21.3 20.9<br />

2005 22.5 22.8 <strong>25</strong>.5 24.8 23.9<br />

2006 23.7 23.5 27.5 26.5 <strong>25</strong>.3<br />

LSD (p = 0.05) for: cultivar – n.s. (not significant differences); years – 0.09; interaction of<br />

cultivar and years – n.s. / R 05<br />

: sk<strong>ir</strong>tumai tarp veisliø neesminiai, tarp metø – 0,09; veisliø <strong>ir</strong><br />

metø – neesminiai.<br />

3<strong>25</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!