23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The variability in the seed yields obtained in the consecutive years of the experiment<br />

was significantly higher than that of the relative protein content in seed mass,<br />

which meant that the protein yield was positively correlated with the yield of seeds,<br />

depending on the changeable weather conditions. In other words, higher seed yield<br />

well compensated for the depressed relative protein yield (Table 3).<br />

Table 3. Total protein yield in pea seed. Baùcyny, 2004–2006<br />

3 lentelë. Suminis baltymø þ<strong>ir</strong>niø sëklose derlius. Baùcyny, 2004–2006 m.<br />

Cultivar<br />

Veislë<br />

Mean of<br />

Year<br />

cultivars<br />

Metai ‘Brylant’ ‘Wenus’ ‘Marych’ ‘Eurika’<br />

t ha -1<br />

Veislës vidurkis<br />

2004 0.918 0.945 0.743 1.054 0.915<br />

2005 1.017 1.001 0.893 1.208 1.032<br />

2006 0.794 0.754 0.778 0.803 0.787<br />

LSD (p = 0.05) for: cultivar – n.s. (not significant differences); years – 0.23; interaction of cultivar<br />

and years – n.s. / R 05<br />

: sk<strong>ir</strong>tumai tarp veisliø neesminiai, tarp metø – 0,23; veisliø <strong>ir</strong> metø –<br />

neesminiai.<br />

Comparing the cultivars, it needs to be said that the highest relative decline in<br />

yields in the th<strong>ir</strong>d year of the experiment was recorded for cv. ‘Eurika’ and ‘Wenus’<br />

(Fig. 3), although the increase in the relative content of protein compensated this<br />

loss, especially in the case of cv. ‘Eurika’, whose relative protein yield in the th<strong>ir</strong>d<br />

year of the experiment was the highest among all the cultivars tested (Table 3).<br />

Fig. 3. Variation of yield of the pea seed (yield in 2004 = 100%)<br />

3 pav. Þ<strong>ir</strong>niø sëklø derliaus kintamumas (2004 m. derlius = 100%)<br />

The application of seed dressing chemicals was an experimental variable, which<br />

was independent from weather conditions. The response of pea seed yielding to the<br />

preparations used was clearly evident and statistically significant in years. Versus the<br />

control plots, where no seed dressing treatments were conducted, the protein yield<br />

obtained was much higher. Such correlation occurred <strong>ir</strong>respective of weather conditions,<br />

in all the years of the trial and for all the cultivars. The increased seed mass<br />

attributed to the application of the seed dressing chemicals was caused by the pro-<br />

326

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!