23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tree vigour. Tree vigour as measured by trunk cross-sectional area at the end<br />

of the eight growing season was significantly affected by rootstocks. P 8–13 produced<br />

the largest trees for both cultivars and was <strong>25</strong>% larger than St. Julien A on<br />

‘Opal’ and 7% larger on ‘Reine Claude’. The smallest trees were produced on Ferlenain<br />

for the cultivar ‘Opal’ and on Fereley for ‘Reine Claude’ (Tables 3 and 4).<br />

These rootstocks gave significant smaller trees on both cultivars compared with the<br />

standard St. Julien A.<br />

Table 4. Effect of rootstocks on trunk cross sectional area, cumulative yield, cumulative<br />

yield efficiency, average fruit weight, soluble solids and tree survival for the cultivar<br />

‘Reine Claude GF 1119’ at the end of the eight growing season<br />

4 lentelë. Poskiepiø átaka slyvø veislës ‘Reine Claude GF 1119’ kamieno skerspjûvio<br />

plotui, suminiam derliui, suminiam produktyvumui, vidutinei vaisiaus masei, t<strong>ir</strong>pioms<br />

sausosioms medþiagoms <strong>ir</strong> vaismedþio iðlikimui aðtuntojo augimo sezono pabaigoje<br />

Rootstock<br />

Poskiepis<br />

Trunk<br />

crosssectional<br />

area<br />

Kamieno<br />

skerspjûvio<br />

plotas,<br />

cm 2<br />

Cumulative<br />

yield (kg<br />

per tree)<br />

Suminis<br />

derlius,<br />

kg medis -1<br />

Cumulative<br />

yield<br />

efficiency<br />

Suminis<br />

produktyvumas<br />

, kg cm -2<br />

Mean<br />

fruit<br />

weight<br />

Vidutinë<br />

vaisiaus<br />

masë, g<br />

Soluble<br />

solids<br />

T<strong>ir</strong>pios<br />

sausosios<br />

medžiagos,<br />

%<br />

Tree<br />

survival<br />

Vaismedžio<br />

išlikimas, %<br />

Ferlenain 63.7 14.2 0.276 23.1 22.3 80<br />

Ferciana 84.6 10.1 0.155 22.8 20.1 100<br />

Fereley 60.5 10.1 0.211 20.3 19.3 100<br />

P 8-13 85.8 9.8 0.156 21.5 18.7 83<br />

St. Julien A 80.3 9.1 0.143 20.8 20.5 100<br />

LSD. P = 0.05% 14.5 2.0 0.037 NS 2.9 -<br />

Yield. The f<strong>ir</strong>st minor crop was harvested in the th<strong>ir</strong>d leaf for the cultivar ‘Opal’,<br />

which was the most productive cultivar. It gave three times larger crop than ‘Reine<br />

Claude’ on the average for the six cropping years. The ‘Reine Claude’ trees came<br />

two years later into production than ‘Opal’. The harvest time for ‘Opal’ was the<br />

second half of August depending on the years and ‘Reine Claude’ one month later.<br />

For ‘Opal’ the rootstock St. Julien A came slower into production than the other<br />

rootstocks. There were rather small differences between the different rootstocks in<br />

productivity: However, the rootstock Ferlenain produced significant larger crop than<br />

the other rootstocks for ‘Reine Claude’ and lower for ‘Opal’.<br />

Yield efficiency. Yield efficiency was calculated for each rootstock on the basis<br />

of yield and trunk cross sectional area. Trees on Fereley were the most yield efficient<br />

for ‘Opal’ and Ferlenain for ‘Reine Claude’. The Ferlenain rootstock was the<br />

least efficient for ‘Opal’ and St. Julien A for ‘Reine Claude’. In general the efficiency<br />

reflected the yields obtained.<br />

Fruit quality. Important quality components like fruit weight and soluble solids<br />

were not much influenced by the different rootstocks. The rootstocks did not have<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!