23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1. Trunk cross-section area increase (cm 2 ) during 1999-2002 as influenced by<br />

different rootstocks and year of study<br />

1 lentelë. Kamieno skerspjûvio ploto (KSP) priklausomumas nuo poskiepiø <strong>ir</strong> tyrimo<br />

metø 1999–2002 m.<br />

Treatment<br />

Veislës <strong>ir</strong><br />

poskiepio derinys<br />

Initial TCSA,<br />

spring of 1999<br />

TCSA increase<br />

KSP padidëjimas, cm 2<br />

Pradinis KSP 1999 m.<br />

pavasará, cm 2 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Final TCSA,<br />

autumn of 2002<br />

Galutinis KSP 2002 m.<br />

rudená, cm 2<br />

‘Jonica’/M.9 2.79 3.84 * bc 6.50 b 6.52 b 5.95 b <strong>25</strong>.6 bc<br />

‘Jonica’/P 60 2.20 3.24 b 4.45 ab 3.50 a 5.72 b 19.1 b<br />

‘Jonica’/M.26 2.73 4.36 c 7.83 b 7.58 b 8.07 c 30.6 c<br />

‘Jonica’/P 22 2.14 1.32 a 1.66 a 2.06 a 4.10 ab 11.3 a<br />

‘Jonica’/P 59 2.05 1.28 a 1.95 a 2.71 a 2.93 a 10.9 a<br />

2.80 a 4.48 b 4.58 b 5.34 c<br />

* Means followed by the same letter do not differ at α = 0.05; Duncan ‘s Multiply Range Test<br />

* Tarp tomis paèiomis raidëmis skiltyse paþymëtø reikðmiø pagal Dunkano kriterijø (α = 0,05)<br />

esminiø sk<strong>ir</strong>tumø nëra.<br />

Table 2. Mean canopy volume (m 3 ) of ‘Jonica’ trees as influenced by different rootstocks<br />

and year of study<br />

2 lentelë. ‘Jonica’ veislës vaismedþiø vidutinio vainiko dydþio priklausomumas nuo<br />

poskiepiø <strong>ir</strong> tyrimo metø<br />

Treatment<br />

Veislës <strong>ir</strong><br />

poskiepio derinys<br />

Canopy volume<br />

Vainiko dydis, m 3<br />

Mean for<br />

treatment<br />

Veislës <strong>ir</strong><br />

poskiepio derinio<br />

vidurkis<br />

1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

‘Jonica’/M.9 1.73 b 1.12 b 1.00 b 2.94 bc 1.70 c<br />

‘Jonica’/P 60 1.53ab 1.00 b 0.79 ab 2.34 b 1.41 bc<br />

‘Jonica’/M.26 1.89 b 1.06 b 1.11 b 3.36 c 1.86 c<br />

‘Jonica’/P 22 1.01 a 0.43 a 0.57 a 1.03 a 0.76 a<br />

‘Jonica’/P 59 1.08 a 0.52 a 0.65 a 1.30 a 0.87 a<br />

1.47 b 0.85 a 0.84 a 2.24 c<br />

This is in accordance with previous reports of Mika et al. (1983), Pätzold and<br />

Fisher (1991), Webster (1997), Baab (1998) and S³owiñski (2001). Skrzyñski and<br />

Poniedziaùek (1998) reported that ‘Jonagold’ trees on rootstocks P 14 and M.26<br />

grew more vigorously, while grafted on P 22 weaker than on M.9. Although some<br />

differences were found between rootstocks M.9 and P 60, they were not statistically<br />

significant. The same reported Voltz et al. (1993) and Ostrowska et al. (2001).<br />

The growth of trees expressed as crown volume was especially decreased by P 22<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!