23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The main objectives of planting trees on vegetative rootstocks are: regulation<br />

of tree size, growth rate and crown volume, induction of early bearing and high<br />

cropping, adaptation of root system to existing soil and climatic conditions (water<br />

deficit toleration, winter hardiness, etc.). Expected beneficial effect on quality of<br />

fruit is often listed at the end of objectives. However, the influence on fruit quality<br />

in an existing worldwide overproduction of apples becomes now more important<br />

issue.<br />

According to Webster and Hollands (1999), we knew still too little about interactions<br />

between rootstock and scion. Rootstock and scion cultivar affect each<br />

other mutually, therefore each combination of those components should be treated<br />

separately (Schneider et al., 1978). The most commonly used in Europe rootstock<br />

M.9 is lately more often criticized (Groot, 1997; Riesen and Husistein, 1998). Studies<br />

on similar crown volumes trees suggest that the more dwarfing rootstock the<br />

better light penetration and photosynthetic productivity could be observed (Baugher<br />

et al., 1994). This logically should influence the whole tree performance and most<br />

importantly – fruit quality. According to Kader (1985), quality is a combination of<br />

features including appearance, texture, flavour, nutritive value and safety. Consumer<br />

demands are already high for flesh f<strong>ir</strong>mness and taste (Autio et al., 1996). For citrus<br />

fruit the influence of rootstock on quality is already well defined (Castle, 1995). For<br />

‘Jonagold’ fruit (and its sport’s as well) flesh f<strong>ir</strong>mness is considered to be the most<br />

important parameter, which by 50% decide internal components of quality (Pladett<br />

et al., 1992). Soluble solids content and acidity in an equal share contribute to the<br />

remaining part of those components. Balanced sugars and acid ratio in apple fruit<br />

could provide sweet but refreshing taste. The latter may occur only when appropriate<br />

acid content is maintained (Vangdal, 1985; Sekse, 1992). For commercially important<br />

apple cultivars such as ‘Jonagold’, there are already known minimal values<br />

for the<strong>ir</strong> acceptability in a selling period – soluble solids should be within 13–14%<br />

and flesh f<strong>ir</strong>mness no lower than 45 N (Hoehn et al., 2001).<br />

The objective of our study was to compare the effect of new Polish rootstocks<br />

and well-known English ones on the main quality features of ‘Jonica’ apples.<br />

Materials and methods. The experiments were carried out on ‘Jonica’ trees<br />

planted on rootstocks of Polish selection: P 22, P 59, P 60 and of Malling Series: M.26,<br />

M.9. The studies were realized in the period of the beginning of full production capacity<br />

of the experimental orchard (4–6 years after planting). Trees were planted at a<br />

spacing of 4 x 1.2 m, in four, 5 trees per each replication. Each 6 th tree in a row was a<br />

pollinator – ‘Ðampion’. All trees were trained as slender spindle. From the middle of<br />

September, fruits from boundary rows around experimental plots were sampled in<br />

weekly intervals for optimum harvest date evaluation. Fruits were picked when Streif’s<br />

harvest index values calculated according to formula F(RS) -1 were within recommended<br />

range (Streif, 1983). Mean fruit size (as weight in grams) and percent of blush<br />

coloured area were evaluated on a 100 fruit sample. Fruit quality evaluation and analysis<br />

(fruit flesh f<strong>ir</strong>mness, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, starch pattern, etc.)<br />

were carried out according to standard methods (Johnson, 1992). The analyses were<br />

performed at optimum harvest date and respective ones after storage for 6 months,<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!