23.01.2015 Views

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

sodininkystė ir daržininkystė 25(4)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SCIENTIFIC WORKS OF THE LITHUANIAN INSTITUTE OF<br />

HORTICULTURE AND LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE.<br />

SODININKYSTË IR DARÞININKYSTË. 2006. <strong>25</strong>(4).<br />

GROWTH AND FRUITING OF APPLE TREE<br />

CV. ‘JONICA’ ON DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS<br />

Przemysùaw BANACH, Maciej GÀSTOÙ<br />

Department of Pomology and Apiculture Agricultural University in<br />

KrakówAl. 29 Listopada 54, 31-4<strong>25</strong> Kraków, Poland.<br />

E-mail przemek351@op.pl<br />

Abstract: The aim of the experiment, conducted in 1999-2003, was to estimate<br />

the influence of five rootstocks (M.9, M.26, P 22, P 59 and P 60) on the growth,<br />

cropping and fruit quality of apple trees ‘Jonica’. The investigated rootstocks significantly<br />

influenced trees’ vigour expressed as trunk cross-section area (TCSA). The<br />

weakest growth was obtained for trees grafted on rootstocks P 59 and P 22 (10.9<br />

and 11.3 cm 2 TCSA), while stronger on M.9 and P 60 (<strong>25</strong>.6 cm 2 and 19.1 cm 2 , respectively).<br />

The trees on M.26 were characterized by the strongest vigour (30.6 cm 2 ).<br />

Weather conditions, especially rainfalls, had a great impact on the growth of the<br />

assessed trees. The growth of trees expressed as crown volume was especially<br />

decreased by rootstocks P 22 and P 59. The highest flowering abundance in comparison<br />

to rootstock M.9 (3.3 in scale 0-5) was observed for P 22 (4.0) followed by P<br />

59 and P 60 (3.5) and M.26 (3.3). Rootstocks did not have an impact on fruit set.<br />

The highest fruit set was observed in 2001 and 2002, and consequently the highest<br />

yield was obtained in these seasons. Though some differences between rootstocks<br />

were found in the respect of yielding, they were not statistically significant. The total<br />

yield varied from 37.5 kg/tree for M.9, 36.4 kg for M.26, 33.3 kg for P 22, 26.1 kg<br />

for P 60 and <strong>25</strong>.3 kg/tree. However, some differences concerning productivity of<br />

trees were found. As far as yield efficiency index is concerned, the most productive<br />

trees were those grafted on rootstocks P 22 and P 59 (2.96 and 2.40 kg/cm 2 , respectively).<br />

Trees on rootstocks M.9, P 60 and M.26 were less productive, with the yield<br />

efficiency index of 1.51, 1.40 and 1.20 kg/cm 2 , respectively. Rootstocks used for<br />

this study significantly differentiated the mean weight of fruit, which varied from<br />

220 g for M.9, followed by M.26 (204 g) and P 60 (197 g), P 22 (178 g) and P 59<br />

(186 g). Rootstocks did not affect fruit coloring.<br />

Key words: apple, rootstock, growth, fruit quality.<br />

Introduction. Rootstock as an integrated part of fruit tree strongly influences<br />

its vigour, productivity and quality of fruits. However, there is no universal rootstock<br />

for all climatic and soil conditions. Altough trees of ‘Jonagold’ grafted on<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!