12.07.2015 Views

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

howe<strong>ve</strong>r, difficult to determine whether the inhabitants of Kenan Tepe were intentionallymaking iron or whether these samples are a by-product of other pyrotechnic activities.Ne<strong>ve</strong>rtheless, the slag and iron debris analyzed thus far show little or no evidenceof copper or tin except in <strong>ve</strong>ry low trace le<strong>ve</strong>ls. Furthermore, these samples ha<strong>ve</strong>high le<strong>ve</strong>ls of heavily reduced calcium and carbon. These observations would supportthe hypothesis that the disco<strong>ve</strong>ry of iron-rich slag in early second millennium contextsat Kenan Tepe might be evidence of <strong>ve</strong>ry early experimentation with iron production.Area DDuring the year 2000 field season UTARP team members opened two 5 by 5meter trenches (D1 and D2) and one 2 by 2 meter sounding (D3) on a smail protrusionon the steep eastern slopes of Kenan Tepe's main mound (Parker et aL. 2000a). Duringthe 2001 field season the two 5 by 5 meter trenches (D1 and D2) were combinedinto one 5 by 10 meter trench (renamed D5 [Fig. 2]). The fact that the 2 by 2 meter sounding(D3) yielded extraordinarily well preser<strong>ve</strong>d walls and associated surfacesprompted us to expand this unit into a 5 by 10 meter trench (renamed D4). Our findingsin trench D4 pro<strong>ve</strong>d to be one of the highlights of the 2001 field season. This operationyielded architecture and large amounts of ceramics belonging to the Red-BrownWash Ware assemblage (Fig. 6). C-14 samples taken from contexts yielding identicalceramics in trench C2 show that this assemblage and its associated architecture datesto the early second millennium B.C. (see abo<strong>ve</strong>).Exeavation in this unit unearthed what we belie<strong>ve</strong> to be a well preser<strong>ve</strong>d publicbuilding. This building included a series of floors that co<strong>ve</strong>red nearly the entire southerntwo-thirds of the trench. Large amounts of ceramics were contained within thematrix of these f1oors. The floors were abutted on the west by a narrow wall (Fig. 8).Three features were bonded to the east side of this wall. The first is a surface or pa<strong>ve</strong>mentconsisting of <strong>ve</strong>ry large stones. Bordering this feature on the north was a singlecourse of mud bricks forming a wall perpendicular to that mentioned abo<strong>ve</strong>. Thesebricks were roughly square measuring approximately 40 by 40 cm. North of and bondedto the mud brick wall was a narrow pa<strong>ve</strong>ment of upstanding ri<strong>ve</strong>r cobbles. The pa<strong>ve</strong>mentis approximately 0.65 cm. wide (north-south) and extends for 1.4 m. east-westbefore entering the east baulk of the trench.The nature of the deposits in trench D4 suggests that all of these remains belongto a single large structure. The series of floors are certainly the remains of insidesurfaces indicating that the east outside wall of this structure has been lost to erosion.Area FArea F is located northeast of the main mound on a fiat terrace approximately23 meters abo<strong>ve</strong> the Tigris Ri<strong>ve</strong>r (Fig. 2). During the 2001 field season UTARP teammembers opened two new trenches (F7 [10 by 10 meters] and F8 [5 by 10 meters])and continued work on four existing trenches (F1, F2, F4, and F9 [formerly F3]. SeeFig.7).For ease of discussion, we ha<strong>ve</strong> organized our excavated contexts in Area F intose<strong>ve</strong>n le<strong>ve</strong>ls. These le<strong>ve</strong>ls generally correspond to contemporary stratigraphic layers,but since we ha<strong>ve</strong> yet to fully connect many of these layers horizontally or bychronometric dating, we must emphasize that the current grouping is tentatiye and maychange in subsequent reports.Le<strong>ve</strong>/1The first le<strong>ve</strong>l in Area F consists of se<strong>ve</strong>ral simple pit burials that cut the cobblestonesurfaces and other /oci of le<strong>ve</strong>l two. In most cases, preservation is too poor to4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!