12.07.2015 Views

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

KAZı SONUÇLARI - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the area of access from the quay, where the presence of an opening was partially unco<strong>ve</strong>red.This access appeared to be built mainly of recycled architectural fragments .Finally, a wall in smail blocks of stone was re<strong>ve</strong>aled to the west of the port, runningnorth-east to south-west: this seems to ha<strong>ve</strong> marked off an area associated with theport buildings (Fig. 5).South-west sector-Circu/ar BuUding (Figs. 6, 7)In the south-western sector, the 2001 campaign saw the continuation on a largescale of the exeavation of the circular-plan building located at the south-west point ofthe promontory, in the area straddling north and south harbours. The building, as alreadydisco<strong>ve</strong>red in the last campaign, is partly hewn out of the rock, underneath a rockyoutcrop which stands o<strong>ve</strong>r it on the east side (constituting one of the island's highestpoints), and partly built of opus caementitium, with an outside wall in Iimestone blocks.The aim of the in<strong>ve</strong>stigation was obviously to gain a complete understanding ofthe building's ground-plan. In particular, it was concemed with: a) identifying the entireextension of the base of the circular portico, already partially visible on the east and southsides, b) excavating the area within the portico and the central area of the building,both only partially in<strong>ve</strong>stigated in the previous campaign.The excavation inside the portico yielded a large number of decorati<strong>ve</strong> architecturalfragments (capitals, columns, bases, marble s/abs and corbels), nails from the roof,and fragments of tiles from the portica's roof. Three openings were identified on theeast and north-east sides. In<strong>ve</strong>stigation of the fourth opening, on the west side, waspostponed for security reasons, as the outside wall is in a bad state of conservationand needs to be reinforced.The total circumference of the portlco's stylobate was identified (Fig. 8): car<strong>ve</strong>dout of the rock on the east and south sides, it appears to ha<strong>ve</strong> been built from scratchalong the other sides. As the rock did not crop out here, itwas obviously necessary tocontinue the portico in masonry. But the rock bed was used as a foundation, as indıcatedby the parallel lines of mortar which ser<strong>ve</strong>d to embed the blocks.Identification of the paving le<strong>ve</strong>l presented particular difficulties, bath inside theportico and in the central area of the building, as it seems to ha<strong>ve</strong> been remo<strong>ve</strong>d systematically.There are only sizeable traces of the le<strong>ve</strong>llings effected (using rubble andmortar) in order to e<strong>ve</strong>n up the surface of the rock bed and, in situ, smail traces of apa<strong>ve</strong>ment in marble slabs (and many broken slabs were found during the excavation),which nonetheless belong to a phase of re-utilization, as same of the slabs ha<strong>ve</strong> beenlaid upside down.Many problems relating to the ground-plan of the building were resol<strong>ve</strong>d, but others,in particular concerning important structural elements and the actual function ofthe monument, ha<strong>ve</strong> yet to be defined. The portico was certainly co<strong>ve</strong>red, and the colonnade(of 24 columns) probably ended in arcades, as suggested by the finding of se<strong>ve</strong>ralarch keystones. The structure of the central area stili remains uncertain (unco<strong>ve</strong>redor, as seems more plausible albeit uncorroborated by the findings, perhaps co<strong>ve</strong>redbya vault and beams).As for its chronology, the architectural fragments, especially the capitals and materialsfound at the le<strong>ve</strong>l of the paving preparation (alsa hundreds of fragments of oillamps with floral patterns which may be compared with samples from workshops ofTarsus and are datable from the early decades of the 5th century A.D.) suggest that thebuilding might be dated between the half or second half of the 5th Centuryand the beginningof the 6th. Its final abandonment can be placed within the half of the Vllth CenturyA.D.2 What is at any rate evident from the building's size and topographical positionis its certain pre-eminence o<strong>ve</strong>r the other buildings in this seeter of the city.2 E.Equini Schneider, "Excavations and Research at Elaiussa Sebaste: The 2000 Campaign", 23. Kazı Sonuçlart Toplantısı,Ankara 2001 (2002), 225-226.439

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!