Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
Subsequent<br />
behaviour of company<br />
According to CETESB, Shell removed and incinerated 2,500 tons of<br />
contaminated soil and fuel sludge in an attempt to remediate the<br />
area.<br />
In late April, the company committed to decontaminating the 180<br />
thousand square meters area until 2003, which will include removing<br />
and burning parts of the soil and installing hydraulic barriers in the<br />
groundwater. Shell will also have to pay CETESB a USD 33,000<br />
fine 139 .<br />
However, Shell did not acknowledge the contamination by "drins" in<br />
the area, claiming that the contamination could have come from<br />
other sources. The company refutes the possibility that it has<br />
contaminated workers and the local community. They claim that<br />
they have already invested over USD 9,000 a year to identify<br />
contamination problems in their facilities in Brazil.<br />
Legal outcome In March 2002, the Public Prosecutor started a public legal case, in<br />
which the defendants are Shell and CETESB (state environmental<br />
agency).<br />
Final <strong>Greenpeace</strong><br />
statement<br />
139 Folha de S. Paulo, 22/4/2002<br />
The case shows the need for making transnational corporations like<br />
Shell accountable and liable for the cleanup and compensation of the<br />
victims of contamination. The refusal from Shell Brazil in negotiate<br />
the solutions with the local community, workers union and authorities<br />
is a clear indication of the need of a global accountability/liability<br />
instrument so justice can be sought at its headquarters in<br />
UK/Netherlands.<br />
71