16.01.2013 Aufrufe

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

hundreds of millions of US dollars as they attempted to find, retrieve<br />

and replace products that used the maize 202 . Aventis estimated that<br />

it would spend from USD 100 million to USD 1 billion on the 25<br />

cents-per-bushel ‘service fee’ to buy the StarLink crop back from<br />

farmers in 2000 and channel it into non-food uses.<br />

Aventis has admitted it will take four years for StarLink to work its<br />

way through the US food supply, while some industry analysts<br />

believe it will take many more years before every kernel of StarLink<br />

maize grown during three seasons is cleared from the US system.<br />

Who is responsible In order to get limited approval of its StarLink maize, Aventis was<br />

required by the EPA to act to ensure the maize did not get into the<br />

food supply. Aventis failed to do so.<br />

Legal and/or public<br />

action taken<br />

Subsequent<br />

behaviour of company<br />

and US authorities<br />

The company admitted that some of the 3,000 farmers who grew<br />

StarLink might not have been told about restrictions on the maize's<br />

use. Some grain elevators handling StarLink were apparently also<br />

unaware of the restriction of its use.<br />

It seems highly probable that this GE maize has also contaminated<br />

maize seed, maize food ingredients and maize products such animal<br />

feed, which are exported from the US.<br />

Both Aventis and the US authorities failed to ensure that the GE<br />

maize – only approved for technical processes and animal feed - did<br />

not contaminate food products.<br />

Consumers claiming allergic reactions to the maize filed lawsuits<br />

against major food companies.<br />

Commodities companies such as Cargill or ADM said they were<br />

going to be holding Aventis responsible and send it bills for their<br />

StarLink-related expenses.<br />

Farmers in some states – backed by State legal officials – have<br />

brought claims against Aventis after their maize lost value because<br />

of concerns over StarLink.<br />

Initially, Aventis attempted to negate the problem and to debate<br />

claims that StarLink had contaminated Taco Bell taco shells.<br />

When US government test lab results confirmed the contamination of<br />

the taco shells, Aventis fought back. In a bid to win approval for<br />

StarLink biotech maize as a safe ingredient for human food, the<br />

company submitted what it claimed was new scientific data to US<br />

regulators, maintaining that StarLink maize was no different from<br />

other types of GE varieties that had been approved for human food.<br />

Aventis also asked American regulators to grant a four-year grace<br />

period of “tolerance” to allow the existing supply of commingled<br />

maize to wind its way through the food chain.<br />

US regulators ruled out any immediate, temporary approval to allow<br />

StarLink in human food. The EPA appointed a panel of scientists to<br />

review the data submitted by Aventis and the US food and biotech<br />

202 Maize-recall cost could reach into the hundreds of millions, Wall Street Journal, 3 November 2000.<br />

97

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!