16.01.2013 Aufrufe

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Type of damage Windscale Fire<br />

radiological impact of discharges”, the actual radiological impact,<br />

compared with 1998, is likely to increase by a factor of between 2<br />

and 4.<br />

BNFL continues to discharge plutonium into the Irish Sea. This is<br />

only going to make a difficult problem worse. And should BNFL<br />

achieve the throughputs it wants in its two reprocessing plants,<br />

plutonium discharges will once again start to rise. In addition, British<br />

research suggests that more than a third of the plutonium discharged<br />

into the sea from Sellafield has gone astray. Some of it may be<br />

buried in sand, but more than previously thought could have been<br />

carried by currents out of the Irish Sea. Between 1952 and 1995,<br />

Sellafield dumped an estimated 182 kilograms of plutonium (alpha)<br />

down sea pipelines into the Irish Sea. This amounts to 717<br />

terabecquerels (TBq) of radioactivity--about half the fallout of<br />

plutonium in the entire North Atlantic from 520 atmospheric bomb<br />

tests in the 1960s.<br />

The British research says there is a "significant shortfall" between<br />

this and the amount detected by monitoring. They carried out a<br />

detailed audit and conclude that 36 per cent (257 TBq) of the<br />

plutonium is unaccounted for, along with up to 40 per cent (387 TBq)<br />

of plutonium's daughter element, americium.<br />

Global nuclear transports - Potential marine and terrestrial pollution:<br />

In 1999, BNFL shipped its first ever consignment of plutonium MOX<br />

fuel around the globe from Sellafield to Japan. During the transit, it<br />

was revealed that BNFL had deliberately falsfied critical quality<br />

control data during the production of the fuel. BNFL ultimately was<br />

forced to admit the falsification, and its Japanese clients demanded<br />

the material be returned. If the fuel had been loaded into a<br />

Japanese reactor, the potential risk for accident could have been<br />

signficantly increased.<br />

In June 2002, BNFL plans to return the reject material to the UK.<br />

The shipment contains enough plutonium for 50 nuclear weapons; in<br />

the event of an attack or accident, the shipment could put at risk<br />

dozens of coastal nations on its 30,000 kilometre voyage back from<br />

Japan.<br />

Workers on site were explosed to up to 150 times the maximum<br />

permissible level of radioactivity and local people receive 10 times<br />

the maximum permitted lifetime dose. The UK Atomic Energy<br />

Authority knew this but decided not to evacuate the area. Two days<br />

after the fire, when it was clear that local milk supplies had been<br />

contaminated by the radio-isotope iodine-131 which affects human<br />

thyroid glands, the government confiscated two million litres of milk<br />

from the cows grazing in an area of more than 500 sq km around the<br />

plant.<br />

Twenty years after the fire, in 1982, the UK National Radiation<br />

Protection Board published a report stating that the effects of the 41<br />

isotopes released at the time of the 1957 Windscale Fire had caused<br />

260 cancer cases, 13 of them fatal. However, other scientists dispute<br />

these figures, saying the NRPB underestimated fatilites due to<br />

84

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!