Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
Legal, public action by<br />
those concerned<br />
Government has not publicly clarified details of the Trust Fund and is<br />
still negotiating the details of the MOU and a Management Council to<br />
govern its operations.<br />
OSPAR: The member states of the Oslo-Paris Convention resolved<br />
in an agreement in 1998, known as the "Sintra Agreement" that the<br />
"significant and progressive" reductions in the marine discharges of<br />
artifical radionuclides were required to ensure concentrations "close<br />
to zero". Ireland has taken the UK to the Convention's arbitration<br />
process because of the UK's failure to consult prior to approving the<br />
Sellafield MOX Plant opening in December 2001.<br />
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea - Ireland has taken the<br />
UK to ITLOS to challenge its approval of the Sellafield MOX Plant<br />
and the resulting transports of nuclear material this will give rise to.<br />
Ireland failed to get an immediate injunction preventing opening of<br />
the plant, but the Court agreed the UK had failed to consult<br />
adequately. The Irish Government is considering further legal action<br />
as a result of the upcoming return MOX shipment. The case is<br />
proceeding.<br />
Dundalk Case -- STAD – the Stop THORP Alliance Dundalk, was<br />
formed to support four litigants in this Irish town on the other side of<br />
the Irish Sea from Sellafield. Children of women who were at a<br />
boarding school near Dundalk in 1957 have been found to suffer<br />
from a high incidence of Downs Syndrome.<br />
In the case against British Nuclear Fuel, the four litigants are suing<br />
BNFL for the harmful effects within Ireland on the grounds that:<br />
1. The THORP concept does not comply with EU law.<br />
2. An Environmental Impact Assessment was not carried out<br />
before the granting of an operating licence.<br />
3. The plant is not justified in relation to Irish citizens living in<br />
Ireland, that is to say that the disadvantages outweigh the<br />
benefits.<br />
Ireland and the Attorney General are also being sued for failing to<br />
protect the plaintiffs and Irish citizens from the hazards of THORP by<br />
not taking appropriate steps to prevent it's operation. (see<br />
www.stad.ie)<br />
Other legal cases:<br />
Between October 1992 and June 1993 two cases were heard at the<br />
High Court in London in which the plaintiffs claimed that the cause of<br />
a fatal leukaemia and a non-fatal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was<br />
paternal preconcention irradiation at Sellafield. The judge found in<br />
favour of the defendants – BNFL. However, the cause or causes of<br />
the increased incidence of leukaemia at Seascale, near Sellafield<br />
remains unclear.<br />
NII cases : The British safety regulator, the Nuclear Installations<br />
Inspectorate, has described safety at Sellafield as "only just<br />
tolerable". In 2000, the NII fined BNFL 40,000 pounds for a relase of<br />
concentrated nitric acid at Sellafield that left two workers with burns;<br />
and 24 thousand pounds for a failure to keep proper control over<br />
88