16.01.2013 Aufrufe

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

Umweltverbrechen multinationaler Konzerne - Greenpeace

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

Subsequent<br />

behaviour of company<br />

around 3500 highly radioactive sources at Sellafield (including losing<br />

some). In 1999/2000 BNFL received 15 non-compliance with<br />

legislation and six enforcement notices from the UK Environment<br />

Agency, for example, for failing to report dischages of radioactive<br />

gases from Sellafield.<br />

Public action: Sellafield has sparked public demonstrations of<br />

concern for many years. In the past year, there have been large<br />

demonstrations in Ireland and Norway, sea-bourne protests from<br />

Norwegian non-governmental groups, and the a 1-million signature<br />

petition from Ireland delivered to Tony Blair by Ali Hewison, the wife<br />

of U2's Bono.<br />

Declaring bankrupt: An announcement by the UK Government on<br />

28 th November 2001 that ownership of Sellafield will be transferred<br />

from BNFL to a Liabilities Management Authority (LMA) amounted to<br />

a tacit admission that activities at Sellafield are now regarded by the<br />

Government as uneconomic. The Secretary of State for Trade and<br />

Industry, Patricia Hewitt told the House of Commons that<br />

“… to enable the LMA [Liabilities Management Authority] to exercise<br />

its role across the whole public sector civil nuclear liabilities portfolio,<br />

the Government now propose to take on responsibility for most of<br />

BNFL's nuclear liabilities and the associated assets. The most<br />

significant of those will be the Sellafield and Magnox sites”.<br />

Poor throughputs have plagued the THORP reprocessing plant, and<br />

are causing a growing disquiet amongst BNFL’s overseas<br />

reprocessing customers. There is now serious doubt over the profit<br />

projections originally used to justify THORP.<br />

In documents leaked to <strong>Greenpeace</strong>, BNFL customers recently<br />

stated that: “…the next business plan will result in another increase<br />

of more than 10% in operating costs, mainly due to the projected 11 th<br />

year of operation of THORP … such cost increases and<br />

uncertainties are commercially highly unsatisfactory and make it<br />

impossible to manage our own fuel cycle business economically,<br />

given the cost pressures we are under.”<br />

Having expressed their displeasure at increasing costs in spring<br />

2001, the foreign customers were reported in October 2001 to have<br />

agreed on new contract terms. Although the customers will pay more<br />

than originally anticipated, the extra cost has been described as “not<br />

unreasonable”, suggesting that BNFL must have agreed to pay some<br />

of the costs of operating THORP for longer. Above all, customers<br />

were said to be satisfied to have limited their exposure to delays in<br />

vitrification of high-level waste at Sellafield, and clarified that they<br />

would not be billed for THORP decommissioning costs 182 . What is<br />

not clear yet, is whether the customers have been told that the<br />

increases in operating costs are unlikely to stop at 10% and will<br />

probably be as much as 30%.<br />

Sellafield’s second largest customer, after the Japanese utilities, is<br />

British Energy. BE recently called for an end to reprocessing. A BE<br />

spokesman stated that:<br />

182 Nuclear Fuel 15 th October 2001. “BNFL overseas customers agree on new reprocessing contract terms”.<br />

89

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!