29.01.2013 Aufrufe

Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres

Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres

Zugang zu Pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen für die ... - Genres

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

W. E. SIEBECK<br />

The rule of free exchange is still observed by major genebanks in the industrial world. As recently<br />

as 1990, the U.S. voted into law that genetic material assembled by its National Genetic Resources<br />

Program is freely available upon request 8 .<br />

Under intellectual property protection, research collaborations will be different. Research<br />

information will flow less freely. In the laboratory and at the greenhouse bench, record keeping<br />

requirements will be more exacting. Publication may be delayed until the potential for commercial<br />

benefits has been assessed which would justify intellectual property protection. Yet, considering<br />

the cost of intellectual property protection, only a fraction of innovations will in the end be so<br />

protected.<br />

Will intellectual property protection actually spur research as many argue? lt will allow, and make<br />

possible, very expensive research. Development of a drug at the average cost of more than $250<br />

million would hardly be possible without intellectual property protection. However, for improved<br />

plant material, particularly food crops, the case for intellectual property protection as an incentive<br />

to research is less clear.<br />

2 Why Then Abandon a Policy That Works?<br />

Although it has served the interests of the international research community well, the free<br />

exchange system is under siege. Pressures come from the developing countries. There are several<br />

reasons for this:<br />

1) The advent of biotechnology has led to broad acceptance of intellectual property protection<br />

of genetically manipulated plant material. Developing countries are concerned that genetic<br />

material originating from their territories, once improved through breeding and research in<br />

industrial countries, will be protected as intellectual property, and no longer be freely available<br />

to them. Because they provided the original input on which improvements were built, they<br />

argue that they be given a share in the commercial profits.<br />

2) Developing countries are realizing the importance of unexplored germplasm as input into<br />

modern breeding programs, particularly since biotechnology has made possible the transfer<br />

of genetic traits across species; while they themselves continue to depend on technologies<br />

generated in the North in these areas. They have discovered that they are holding a bargaining<br />

chip in the form of raw germplasm of which today's still untapped resources are primarily<br />

located in centers of biological diversity on their territories.<br />

3) The free exchange system gave developing countries the finished varieties to grow the food<br />

to feed their increasing populations, but did not succeed in giving them the technology to<br />

8<br />

etc. 1632(a)(4) of Public Law 101-624 of November 28, 1990 reads: "The Secretary (of Agriculture),<br />

shall (4) make available upon request, without charge and without regard to the country from which such<br />

request originates, the genetic material which the program assembles".

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!