Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland
Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland
Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
11. Literatur 210<br />
with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological<br />
studies. Lancet 1996;347:1713–27.<br />
101. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors <strong>in</strong> Breast cancer. Breast cancer and<br />
hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological<br />
studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without<br />
breast cancer. Lancet 1997;350:1047–59.<br />
102. Committee on Quality Assurance <strong>in</strong> Mammography W. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es of the American<br />
College of Radiology. 1999.<br />
103. Council of Europe (Hrsg). Develop<strong>in</strong>g a methodology for draw<strong>in</strong>g up guidel<strong>in</strong>es on<br />
best medical practice. Recommendation Rec (2001)13 adopted by the Committee of<br />
M<strong>in</strong>isters of the Council of Europe on 10 october 2001 and explanatory memorandum.<br />
Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe Publish<strong>in</strong>g, 2002.<br />
104. Council of Europe. Recommendation NO. R (97) 17 on the development and<br />
implementation of quality improvement systems (QIS) <strong>in</strong> health care. Strasbourg:<br />
Council of Europe, 1997.<br />
105. Cret<strong>in</strong> S. Putt<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>to practice <strong>in</strong>: Margolis CZ, (1999). In: Cret<strong>in</strong> S.<br />
Implement<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Chicago: AHA Press.<br />
106. Damascelli B, Frigerio LF, Lanocita R, Patelli G, et al. Stereotactic excisional breast<br />
biopsy performed by <strong>in</strong>terventional radiologists us<strong>in</strong>g the advanced breast biopsy<br />
<strong>in</strong>strumentation system. Br J Radiol 1998;71:1003–111.<br />
107. Decker T, Ruhnke M, Schneider W. Standardized pathologic exam<strong>in</strong>ation of breast<br />
excision specimen. Relevance with<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary practice protocol for quality<br />
management of breast sav<strong>in</strong>g therapy. Pathologe 1997;18:53–9.<br />
108. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Plann<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
A Guide to Nom<strong>in</strong>al Group and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, USA<br />
1975.<br />
109. Dempsey P, Rub<strong>in</strong> E. The roles of needle biopsy and periodic follow-up <strong>in</strong> the evaluation<br />
and diagnosis of breast lesions. Sem<strong>in</strong> Roentgenol 1993;28:252–8.<br />
110. Dent DM, Kirkpatrick AE, Mc Googan E, Chetty U, Anderson TJ. Stereotaxic<br />
localization and aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions. Cl<strong>in</strong> Radiol<br />
1989;40:380–2.<br />
111. Denton ER, Field S. Just how valuable is double report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g mammography?<br />
Cl<strong>in</strong> Radiol 1997;52:466–8.<br />
112. Department of Health Medical Devices Directorate. Evaluation of specimen radiography<br />
cab<strong>in</strong>ets: reports and guidance notes. Blue book (MDD/91/ 13) London:<br />
Department of Health 1991;1–33.<br />
113. Dershaw D, Eddens G, Liberman L, Deutch BM, Abramson AF. Sonographic and<br />
cl<strong>in</strong>ical f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> women with palpable breast disease and negative mammography.<br />
Breast Dis 1995;8:13.<br />
114. Desch CE, Benson AB, Smith PJ, et al. Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es by the American Society of Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Oncology. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 1999;17:1312.<br />
115. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft. Koord<strong>in</strong>ation: Informationszentrum für kl<strong>in</strong>ische Studien<br />
(ISTO), <strong>in</strong> Qualitätssicherung <strong>in</strong> der Onkologie-Diagnose und Therapie maligner<br />
Erkrankungen – Kurzgefasste <strong>in</strong>terdiszipl<strong>in</strong>äre <strong>Leitl<strong>in</strong>ie</strong>n. edited by Hermanek P,<br />
München Bern Wien New York, Zuckschwerdt Verlag 2000;124–63.<br />
116. Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft. Empfehlungen des Ausschusses Magnetresonanzmammographie<br />
für Qualitätsanforderungen der MRT der Mamma. Jahresbericht<br />
1995;43:59–61.<br />
117. Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft. Empfehlungen der DRG: <strong>Leitl<strong>in</strong>ie</strong>n Mammadiagnostik,<br />
<strong>Leitl<strong>in</strong>ie</strong> Mamma<strong>in</strong>tervention. 2002.<br />
118. Dey I. Qualitative research. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge,<br />
London, NewYork. 1993.